"The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking.
It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.”
Albert Einstein
*....and our thinking is being changed to woke....and we will regress, not progress, as some are deplatformed, lose their jobs or bank accounts and soon maybe even their homes because of their political and other views.
Now the English "white" race must be subservient to all other races in their own land, this too is racism, yet
we are expected to tolerate even this.
We Do Not Care If You Are Black Or White, Rich Or Poor. We Care Only, That We All Obey The Law.
That We Respect The Police Who Maintain It For Us, And Are A Considerate Citizen To All.
Love The Nation In Which You Live And Respect The Flag It Flies. Otherwise, What Have You Come To Do?
Wherever You Are, Seek To Build Peace & Prosperity WORLDWIDE, And Play Your Positive Part.
Do Not Tear Down To Destroy.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE AND WHERE IS HERE?
Democracy is not perfect but it is a system that allows nations to progress economically, scientifically and in technology, improving health, welfare and its people being free to live and speak without too many restrictions or fear. There is a now a problem that we may have too much democracy and no rules on anything, even whether we are male or female, or that some can be exempt from Police procedures due to their race, or we can have as many dogs as we like in densely populated cities which will become a public health issue, or music can be played at volume on street pavements, parks, trains tubes. Now some of us can no longer safely ask "where are you from?" for fear of giving offense and losing our job or reputation. However, to avoid poverty and to save planet earth, democracy also needs to include reducing family size nationwide and worldwide voluntarily, even though others say a decreasing population is not good due to our aging population and we need immigration for economic "growth", but we cannot keep supporting "growth" in all its previous forms due to the demands on the planet. We have to expect less in order to save the planet and the many poverty stricken children and nations. African and other poor nations do not make financial progress, not because of slavery 200 years ago, but because they have large families they cannot afford and cannot trade easily due to lack of knowledge or corrupt leadership. We need to reduce the world population from 8 billion in 2022 (and rising 1 billion every decade) to 4 billion, even as recent 1960 it was only 3 billion. This policy alone could save the planet and with a better chance that every child is educated, housed, with a job and enough water and food, perhaps even a minimum welfare payment from 18. The people of the world could take control of this themselves just by doing it regardless of the Government and by word of mouth and by what they choose for family size. Governments could promote it in their home nations for their population AND for all refugees/Asylum seekers that arrive, and for Foreign Aid to assist with contraception worldwide, and to break down religious and cultural barriers generally and those that are against contraception. It is no good having children, even if supposedly by God's command, if the children suffer or do not survive. Africa's population by 2050 is due to double, the UK to grow only by 3%, this is because the English in the UK (and some other European/Western nations) have on average have 2 or less children per woman/family.This is likely to change in 10 years or so as African and other cultures arrive legally or illegally into the UK but still have 3 to 10 children. They then demand the taxpayer feed and house their large families, as is currently the case, Marcos Rashford promoted Taxpayer support for children during holidays as well as school term. His Mother was an immigrant and had 5 children, and he suffered, it is the choice of parents that must change, not that the the Taxpayer pays. Western nations have prospered due to 2 or less children, many children are sent unaccompanied from abroad and end up in the UK Council Care system, which is no life for any child. They suffer, maybe for life. New immigrants do not realise that being allocated a Council property is not a "right" or opportunity that we all are offered, only a very few, many English also need these homes, but do not get them because so many immigrants have arrived with greater needs and many children. The English may also wait 10 years or more for one, but most are not allocated points to even access/bid on any property. With smaller families the Taxpayer can then afford to provide free health care and education to their population and lists will reduce in housing, NHS, schools. We have seen the phenomenal economic success of China in reducing poverty and creating prosperity due their one child policy. That was an enforced policy and the people are not a free society as the Western democracies, but that does not mean we should not take note of their success in curtailing their population, 100 years ago the UK was also very poor when families were 5 to 10 children. We should now seek a voluntary policy of 2, 1 or zero children in the UK and worldwide, if only for the survival of the planet and the parents that struggle to provide for them, and to reduce the suffering of vulnerable children. This should also be combined with a policy of advice to young people to have no children before age 25 to allow greater emotional, psychological and mental security and chance for each young adult to be live independently and be free of the responsibility of children. A child is a lifetime of sacrifice and responsibility and teenagers do not realise this until its too late, by then they are locked into poverty with children they cannot afford.The above also increases the chances of choosing a partner that will be for life, or at at least until the children have reached 18, or 11 at worst. It should be common knowledge that both parties in a relationship should use contraception, as the pill is not 100% successful, I have known of 5 women where it is has failed. A child should not be conceived until your partner is known to you ideally for 12 months, or 6 months at least, and ideally when you have both decided you want that relationship for life. If you doubt the commitment of marriage or civil partnership with a person, a child conceived early in life with someone we decide later we do not like, means they will still have rights to see the child, this may upset any new relationship either party will have, it is a lifetime pressure. It matters that we wait until we decide to marry or have a civil partnership. In reality, accidents of conception happen, but if we promote this advise nationwide and worldwide, particularly to the young, we help them to avoid poverty and discord in their lives, sowing the seeds for a happier life, not a life of poverty and discord for both parents and children from an early age. As for needing immigration, or higher birthrate that some nations are suggesting, they say some western nations have a high elderly population that cannot be supported by the Tax collected by the increasingly shrinking younger population, this may be true. If we just do the same again i.e. more immigration with lower salaries and promoting more births, we should think of alternatives, i.e. if we do the same thing we will get the same result, ballooning population, climate crisis, increasing poverty for the majority. What is the alternative? I have been a NHS nurse and a patient. We are kept alive by medications and suffer in other ways. Much of NHS healthcare is dealing with side affects of the medication we are on, at its worst we have dementia where our body functions but our brain does not. Many spend 5 years or more in a care home with no awareness of self or family, it is a living hell for all concerned. We must have the option of "assisted dying" which is by choice and verified by 2 doctors for those with terminal illness, the patient chooses the time for themselves, they may not choose it, but like abortion, it should be there for those that need to due to great pain or suffering, or difficult circumstances. It should not be for the healthy to decide for the sick that they must suffer to the end, nor for the person not carrying a child to decide whether another should keep a pregnancy, it is for pregnant women who must take care of it, and her conscience to make that decision. Life is hard at the best of times, for some they consider it is better not to have been born. We often hear of a great trauma by parents who wish to keep their child alive against medical advice, these parents are not always thinking of the child who faces a lifetime of suffering, and the parents are often not the ones caring or paying for that child. Technology is such that there must be some way that we can reduce our world population so that some have a little less and some have a little more and that we all have medical care, a home, a basic income, but to allow those who wish to thrive if they have the talent, so that progress can continue. Progress for all, not as a form of power and superiority, as even talent/academic ability is God given/ luck/ chance, but it takes effort by those individuals to develop their talent. We should not vilify/condemn the rich/talented any more than the poor, we all need each other, the skilled and unskilled. The priority is that throughout life all may have the opportunity in life to grow and develop their talent and to make money from it, and to be taxed, but not so much that it takes away all incentive and while the poor have 6 children they cannot afford and then expect that hard earned tax by others to be spent on those children when they have had 2 to make sure they can afford them. Equally, we should not be banning Grammar schools that allow the talented but poorer children to work their way to a better financial place in life, nor to take away charitable status of private schools which allow a better education for those that can afford it. Education is key to progress, these policies are a form of vindictiveness or "dumbing down" by those that suggest them i.e. I cannot afford/ do not have the talent, so you cannot have it either. We need everyone's talent, academic or otherwise. The UK has an education that allows further education wherever you live and what ever talent we may have, it is then down to the child or adult do with that as they wish. Oppressing others to save the oppressed is not progress.
"It is important for the common good to foster individuality: for only the individual can produce the new ideas which the community needs for its continuous improvement and requirements — indeed, to avoid sterility and petrifaction"
Albert Einstein
John Maynard Keynes (Economist 1883-1944) “Barring such catastrophes as uncontrollable flood of population or a totally destructive war, was not a continuation of the current state of misery and doubt, but a prospect so fair as to be almost unbelievable, nothing less than Adam Smiths heralded land of universal plenty "(The Worldly Philosophers by Robert Heilbroner Page 288). We will ALL return to WW2 and pre-war “misery and doubt” if the welfare system, education and law system fails even in the UK due to the legal and illegal mass immigration into the UK. If immigrants continue with large families in the UK, the UK islands will eventually not be able to house, feed, provide water, health care and education for anyone. We will ALL enter poverty en masse and we will ALL regress. The UK is 2.4 Trillion debt, this is not normal, it is not the time for strikes of 19%/35% salaries stoking inflation or new Europeans wars, or woke policies that gives people jobs and opportunities by race, colour, gender, it should ALWAYS be by merit, or mankind will NOT survive, we will just be giving power to those who cannot cope, or those with a racial agenda like Sadiq Khan (Muslim Pakistani) the London Mayor who did not speak out to deter Black Lives Matter protesters going out during Covid lockdown in order to protect all Londoners from a deadly virus, and Tedros Adhanom (Ethiopian) the Director General of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) who did not condemn the Black Lives Matter protests in the USA or elsewhere but said it was an important issue and they should be allowed. He was in charge of the health of the nations and announced massive public protests can go ahead. This is racial bias and partisan behaviour and typical of decisions made by dictators, and why the African nations do not progress, because the decisions made are biased/corrupt. As indeed are many white Academics promoting woke ideology that suppresses truth and free speech. Both of these man should be charged with Abuse of Power in Public office and removed from office, but they remain despite these abuses. Now in many Western nations see some new history being taught in schools without any parental involvement, positive discrimination for black lives to access positions in boardrooms and university places but with a lower grade. This is called "dumbing down" and will lead to corruption and poor service in every area of life. It is hard to find good leaders and teachers even with good grades or experience, if positions are given just because of race or colour then we will get the same result as from the above 2 men. They and others despise the UK, or the English "white" occupants in particular. They will only be happy when they control the government and all its institutions and the English have left, and made the nation Muslim, by then there will be civil war and disorder as they will have defunded the Police and there will be no law and order. They will have made hero's and statues of people like Floyd and Duggan for their children to emulate , who were criminals killed by Police during a crime. Floyd once took a gun to a pregnant woman.s stomach during a robbery, so instead of being killed by the Police the society will be killing each other and far worse. We in the UK are being asked to subdue our legitimate objections to this and be insulted by people like Ngomi Fulani who was given access to the King at charity reception and refused to answer a simple question or "where are you from" feigning offense to someone merely interested in her charity and her nation of origin. Well actually, we have had enough of this stupidity that is being endorsed by our leaders, and we also to claim a right to be offended and object to submitting way to stupidity.
We now have (2023) " a catastrophe of an uncontrollable flood of population" warned against above and we will regress into poverty and crime unless we create a new way of co-habiting and progression forward. We need a political change to gradually bring in more Independent MPs that any Prime Minister can appoint to his team if he so wishes including those in the usual Political Parties. It is a level playing field, they can promote themselves equally by website, by you tube, have equal slots on TV and radio, and as is currently the case equal access to a one leaflet postal drop. Potential applicants should not win just because they have more money, or they have some union/newspaper backer. There must be an introduction of Direct Democracy, or Polity Polling , where significant issues are put forward to the passport holding public who can vote on the internet and possibly as normal referendum by polling. These referendum questions should always have 10 minute video clips on the pro's and cons of each question by those in the Government who are dealing with the department in question and/or a third parties like The New Culture Forum or GB News, or perhaps any interetsed party. The public and others can also put up their own 10minute video clips on you tube. Referendum questions for instance: 1) "Shall the UK unilaterally, or with Greece and Italy, call for a Moratorium on Asylum and all immigration to the UK " the Home Secretary should provide a video. and someone in Government with an opposing view should counteract with another video. 2) "The BBC does not adhere to unbiased reporting and surreptitiously promotes policies/stories it supports. Should we a) remove the License Fee so that the Taxpayer no longer funds this corporation and only allow use of the name BBC for the World Service and no purchase of the BBC name allowed. 3) Should we make it illegal for Transgender teaching in schools until age 16, and also use of teaching tools from Transgender groups cannot be used. Nor should schools promote transgender medication or surgery, or a child be allowed to obtain these services until 18 years when they can make their own choice? These issues must be dealt with at home and via GP until age 18 when the child can use the GP files for a potential transgender change from age 18 following counseling for at least 2 years. There should be no self identifying. The schools should not be involved in teaching this matter at all, it is a form of grooming/brainwashing of vulnerable children en masse. 4) Uk Police are being politicized and have no time for real crime. Should we remove all tasks of discrimination and race related speech or incidents and resort to police intervention only for actual attack / assault, which is actual crime as most understand it. Should we also pass a law that clarifies that "running from the Police, avoiding capture by use of car. or electric bike or scooter, or refusing to comply, by a child or adult, will not mean the Police will be charged but those running will be deemed guilty for obstructing Police whatever the race of the person. Also that stop and search will be allowed whatever race of the person, otherwise there is no equality or justice, only the excuse of diversity that allows some to have special exceptions to law and order which is not acceptable or just. 5) Should council homes only be allocated to the UK born, not for immigrants or refugees that are not always refugees and often come with money, or paid a lot of money to arrive, more than I could even save while in the UK so they are not poor, but come to claim housing, welfare, health care, making these services unavailable to to the Taxpayer who has paid for them. However, it is many of our leaders (not all) and the BBC that have abused their power and brought us to this place where opportunism has nearly given away England. there might be time to save it, it depends what happens at the 2024 election, before and after.
“THE END GAME - 2023”
(Woke, Black Lives Matter, & 89'000 children in Council care)
What shall we do
So many pass through
Hands held out
For bread and stout.
Fleeing from war
Or an empty store
Not wanting to play
The game we say.
What do I mean
It’s all a dream
To those that come
They call for Mum.
And feed from the breast
Of taxpayers fest
Thinking it’s theirs
To allay their dares.
The English are told
We have to be sold
To maintain the flow
Of infinite dough.
As houses are filled
By demand of will
The English sit tight
Ready for flight, or fight.
Many children are born
That no one has sworn
To feed or love
By the glorious Dove.
But the Dove is made black
And put in a sack
As now we must see
What we believe.
Many children are born
To teach in the storm
Now they have knives
And evil eyes.
For what we have done
Under the Sun
The English I mean
And the immigrants dream.
The reality is
There is a twist
The dream is far gone
No longer switched on.
It’s all in the past
Time passes so fast
Many children are born
Now forlorn.
Not wanting to play
The game we say
Obeying the Law
Not being poor.
Many children unfed
No Taxpayer left
The English oppressed
The language bereft.
What did we do
So many passed through
The demand so great
On the State.
Even our own
Corrupted seed sown
Eventually war
Poverty and poor.
Racism or realism
Both are a prison
At the end of the day
We all have to play
The game we say
A certain way
Not yours or mine
But the sublime.
Submit and progress
Though we have less
Discuss and dispute
Sometimes refute.
Not shut the door
Of the jaw
We agree or not
It matters a lot.
All sides must speak
Or the nation is freaked
Distorted by power
We raise ourselves lower.
Woke will force it
Make us see fit
Then will torch us
Under the bus.
Is there a war?
Someone is poor
Is there a peace?
Poverty has ceased.
The child will suffer
For there is no buffer
Deserted by you
Your love not true.
The child is the nation
Stops at the station
You forgot to love
No hope from above.
They turn on despair
Into a fare
Of crime and theft
Then left bereft.
Because you gave birth
When there is no mirth
They tossed and turned
Eventually spurned.
England's lost speech
Supposedly freaks
And Masters of power
Yet holding flowers.
There is no privilege
We all under siege
These words of war
At their core.
England is bereft
The English have fled
Or died in the war
Of empty store.
What shall we do
So many passed through
The English oppressed
Till nothing was left.
Was that the aim
Of all that came?
We gave what we could
It was not all good.
But look to your past
It goes so fast
Look to your present
From where you have been sent.
It is no better
Look at the letter
Of history
Mankind’s misery and victory.
None can survive
None will thrive
If "rights" prevail
Hammered by nail.
That riots and rules
By anger and fools
Disbanding Police
Law, order, ceased.
Who is to blame
If we all the same
It’s not quite true
I think not like you.
Watch what you speak
Watch what you seek
If you oppress
We all become less.
We all work hard
We all play our part
For good or ill
Stop. Think. Be still.
Thinking is fun
Think freely as one
It alone is the key
For VOLUNTARY harmony.
LEO ROSTEN
“The purpose of life is not to be happy, but to matter, to be productive, to be useful,
to have it make some difference that you lived at all”
“Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.”
Albert Einstein
Which includes being free to ask "where are you from" to whatever depth we might mean it.
How can can we learn about each other, to interact sincerely with each other,
if we purposely hide our origins while also wanting others to celebrate our origins?
How can the Police and others do their job without this question?
This issue is a "watershed moment" for racist or reverse racist "thinking".
We cannot submit to this attack on the very basics of free speech,
It will stifle growth, harmony and the safety of society.
It is a step too far, for to hide ones origins is often hiding crime or devious activity.
Why would anyone hide where they are from, their actual place of birth, or ancestry.
We are a multi racial society and we are expected to celebrate it , even the host nation culture.
We should not withhold our origins, that too can be racism.
Particularly at a social events.
The UK is already 2.4 trillion in debt and its services already strain, we are on the brink of collapse and we will be a third world economy in a decade if Law & Order breaks down and external investment ceases, which eventually means no jobs, pensions or welfare benefits for anyone. It was announced recently (Jan 2023) that for the first time there are more people in the UK receiving more in benefits than they pay in tax. This means the Taxpayer is supporting them even though working, and the benefit, welfare and health system will not survive, perhaps even the education system, then there WILL be poverty and crime. We have thousands of Asylum seekers crossing the Channel who are unskilled, not speaking English, possibly criminals and wanting homes, food, Legal Aid, Health care all free of charge and jumping the queues for services because they have nothing, but many born in the UK, of any ethnicity, do not have much either. If we pay tax we are collectively paying for these services , those not paying tax will get services free and hinder those who are paying due to the increased demand they bring. ALL those born in the UK need to pay attention to this as it will affect you directly. The various health, housing, education systems will not sustain this demand and it will collapse, it is already beginning. Not because of mismanagement, but because we have an uncontrollable flood of people into the nation that are costing a great deal of money and we cannot stop them arriving, this is normally called an invasion, but we are not allowed to say that, to say what is true, what is fact. These problems are partly because France is escorting them to cross the Channel instead of turning them back, and the EU generally do not, or cannot stop refugees/asylum/economic migrants crossing their borders. It is mostly due to Asylum no longer being viable for ANY nation, it now just gives people a legal "narrative" to invade whatever nation they choose. Those nations then have to pay to house and feed them according to international law, even though illegal immigrants have spent thousands paying criminals and passed through many other "safe" nations before arriving in the UK. They put themselves and their children into unnecessary danger in a small boat, some have even been housed in France or Turkey already. Those who fail asylum, they then refuse to return to their home nation, having destroyed their passports, or just disappear into UK society to commit crime to survive, or are victim of crime, thre seems no answer.
We all must be concerned about this, both the resident immigrant and the English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, no nation has unlimited money, be it the UK, EU, USA, to support thousands/millions who just turn up from another nation. The UK, EU, USA are also now involved in an indirect war assisting the Ukraine which is costing money in "arms" and has also created an energy crisis affecting us all due to sanctions the West has made against Russia. This has created economic and energy issues and inflation. Yet the Unions and Labour politicians, mislead the public saying it is the fault of the Government only and encourage strikes for higher pay, which will only make the problem worse. They do this not for the benefit of workers, but to cause the Government to collapse in order to gain power. Even if Labour get into power this way, they will still have the same problems, and they also cannot spend money as we will still be 2.6 trillion in debt, and this could easily tip into bankruptcy and we will be like Venezuela, no jobs, no health care, crime rife and people fleeing to the USA. Inflation is 10%/11% now (Feb 2023) and was due to fall hopefully by September 2023 , yet nurses strike for 19% pay rise, putting lives at risk when the starting (training) salary is around £24,000, average salary is £35'000 and other salaries go up to £50'000 or more, Teachers are much the same. As for Doctors asking for a 35% rise "A junior doctor in their first year as a foundation doctor will receive basic pay of just under £29,400, with earnings typically rising to almost £37,000 after taking into account payments for extra duties. Second-year doctors earn an average of £43,300" (Google). Junior doctors at this rate are in their first year after training and are gaining experience, the salary goes up each year, these strikes go against their contracts and their oath not to harm patients. We have just had Covid and extreme costs due to that, with 6 million plus patients already on the waiting lists (now 8 million (Oct 2023). We have a war and an energy crisis and spike in inflation, we are all suffering yet doctors and nurse strike at this time, cancelling yet more operations and appointments making the waiting lists even longer and directly endangering lives, many have already died. This could be deemed premeditated manslaughter. The problem for the NHS staff is overwork due to understaffing and massive salary hikes will make this problem worse as there will be less staff employed, not more. The NHS is not for profit unlike the USA, where there is very little free health care, also Australia, even in the EU some have basic rate tax of 25% to 40% and they may have better pensions, homes. The UK basic tax rate is only 20%, doctors, nurses, teachers and other professions would very soon lose the benefit of higher salaries if we then had to switch to these higher tax rates.
We must cease and desist on strikes for unrealistic salaries which fans inflation, we have to cut back for a period, and also start realising as a society, that statistics show that parents financially tend to manage with 2 children but often start tipping into poverty with 3 children. These strikes are a cynical design by Union leaders who seek political power via the Labour Party who are Marxist, Communist, Socialist. These political theories were tested and failed in 1989 when the Berlin wall came down and when Venezuela collapsed in 2014. These theories are still pursued by Russia and China. Do we want a society like these and run by such leaders? Labour will spend and Unions will strike until we are bankrupt, they have always done this before in this last 50 years, every time. Even the Conservatives have had to spend money due to exceptional problems with Covid and the Ukraine war and the resulting energy crisis. The BBC do not air these related problems we are facing when interviewing Unions and the NHS staff or the public. We just hear "the UK is rich we can afford it" "the nurses, fire service, teachers deserve more". We all may deserve or like more, but they have reasonable salaries already and the NHS is not a private profit making company. In the private sector we only get a pay rise if the company is making a profit, and we are given a job, only if our own contribution is more useful than others they could employ.
The problem is we are now already nearly bankrupt being 2.6 trillion in debt. As India said to Russia, now is not the time for war, it is also not the time for political games and strikes. We "the people", of ALL cultures in the UK, have to unite to sacrifice a little and seek to end the uncontrollable and unsustainable immigration in order to save the nation we live in. This includes the BBC who have become biased and partisan in destroying Britain, airing only the one sided woke opinions which they prefer. The UK islands are limited for land space which is our only sustenance and safety, whatever race we are. We need to do this now, as maybe in 10 years, we will not have a nation or land to call home, literally, certainly no functioning welfare and health services. We cannot rely on soundbites, or the BBC opinion only, they were once trustworthy, not now, If we cherish the nation we live in whereever we are , we can then cherish the world and all people in it. As we now have all the world IN the UK i.e. over 100 ethnicity and 300 languages spoken. This could make us very successful if we go forward united with new ideas, not allowing cultures and religion to divide us, OR, it will break us absolutely and we will not rise again, nor will the immigrants in it. There will be no "rights" for anyone if the UK goes bankrupt, we will be as the nations that the immigrants/refugees come from. There will be no Foreign Aid from any nation if seekers of asylum and refugees think that multiple children in their new host nation is a freedom they can enjoy, even though the taxpayer is feeding and housing them, not they themselves, as many say, the richer economies are not a "moneytree" we all have to work hard and pay our way, 90% suffer lack and poverty at some time in life, hate what we do for work, get bullied or attacked for some reason, whether white of black skin, because we are ugly or too attractive, too clever or not clever enough, or just "odd". It's life , and we cannot have special "equality" for some and not for others, everything in life is by talent and hard work, otherwise we will not appoint /reward the best to do the job, but we will be "dumbing down" or regressing, whether we appoint to have more women, more transgender, more gay, more black, more ethnic groups, society will nor progress that way. There are many talents and abilities and we all have them, not all talents have to be academic, singing, acting. It is just finding something we do and love and having contentment with that, life seems unfair because some do have more talents than others, so some of us may not "make it" whether we have talent not, but its up to us to keep trying with what we have and not play the victim and blame everyone else, or the Government. Everything we have in life is what man has created from what he has discovered, men over the centuries have been very cruel, we are becoming better, but "woke" is not better as it is stifling free speech and removing clever and talented people from being able to speak. Someone on the BBC Radio 4 said on air that JK Rowling "was not a very nice person", and that maybe we should not buy her books, or see the films based on her books, so now some are printing her books without her name so they feel better reading them. There are many of us concerned about woke and many other issues in life today and if a transgender person can say the above freely, whose only achievement might be to be a transgender person and speak on the BBC. Yet he/she does not want allow another person to have a different view on a controversial issues like this, neither does the BBC, that is not equality of action or freedom of speech, or impartiality by the BBC. If one reads wikipedia on JK Rowling one can see the difficult life she had over her lifetime, I do not agree with her views on supporting the Labour Party or opposing Brexit, but she has achieved much and is an inspiration to anyone going through difficulty to "keep on keeping on" as we never know how far we will get until the day we die, and that should be our focus in life, not bringing others down or curtailing their right to disagree. This include "Black Lives Matter " whose leaders are openly Marxist, openly telling the "whites" to "get out of our way" (GB news). We should remember Stalin and Lenin in Russia had a policy of sending those with controversial opinions writers, speakers, philosophers, academics,polictical opponents to workcamps in Siberia , millions died, even now an unnecessary war has been started by Russia. Hitlers regime started much the same way. This is why the supporters of "woke" policies of de platforming those they do not agree with, or causing them to lose their jobs is seen as sinister and a repeat performance of what has already been before, we know how it will end already. If we do not know even a little recent history, we will not see the dangers or where it leads. This is how Hitler workedm and Russia, China, North Korea Iran and some others work.
What is Woke? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/09/woke-word-meaning-definition-progressive "The word woke loosely refers to a social media-fueled, left wing political ideology that emerged in the English-speaking world in the early 2010s. The term is derived from the state of being awake to or conscious of structural inequalities in society and being hyper-aware of one’s own role in those inequalities. Someone who is woke is constantly inspecting every institution in society, looking for the presence of racism, sexism, and other forms of pervasive prejudice".
What is Marxism?
"To define Marxism in simple terms, it's a political and economic theory where a society has no classes. Every person within the society works for a common good, and class struggle is theoretically gone. Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy named after Karl Marx. It examines the effect of capitalism on labor, productivity, and economic development and argues for a worker revolution to overturn capitalism in favor of communism".
What is Theocracy? "A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god. "his ambition is to lead a worldwide theocracy"
What is a Dictatorship? "A dictatorship is a type of government in which a single person—the dictator—or party has absolute power. This means that the ruler or party has complete control. The rights of the people are typically suppressed in a dictatorship, sometimes to a great degree".
What is Capitalism: "Capitalism is often thought of as an economic system in which private actors (persons) own and control property in accord with their interests, and demand and supply freely set prices in markets in a way that can serve the best interests of society. The essential feature of capitalism is the motive to make a profit. What does it mean to be capitalist? Individual capitalists are typically wealthy people who have a large amount of capital (money or other financial assets) invested in business, and who benefit from the system of capitalism by making increased profits and thereby adding to their wealth. By assuming the autonomy (independance of thought, action, choice) of the individual, capitalism grants dignity to the poor. By affirming people's right to their own labor, regardless of their position on the economic ladder, capitalism offers the poor the means to improve their own well-being. As an economic system, one of the effects of capitalism is that it breeds competition between countries and perpetuates poverty among developing nations due to the individual interests of private corporations rather than the needs of their workers. inequality, market failure, damage to the environment, short-termism, excess materialism and boom and bust economic cycles".
What is Socialism: "Socialism is, broadly speaking, a political and economic system in which property and the means of production are owned in common, typically controlled by the state or government. Socialism is based on the idea that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society. A socialist country is a sovereign state in which everyone in society equally owns the factors of production. The four factors of production are labor, capital goods, natural resources and entrepreneurship. Disadvantages of socialism include slow economic growth, less entrepreneurial opportunity and competition, and a potential lack of motivation by individuals due to lesser rewards".
"The verdict is in, and contrary to what socialists say, capitalism, with all its warts, is the preferred economic system to bring the masses out of poverty and to make them productive citizens in our country and in countries around the world. Remember this: Capitalism rewards merit, socialism rewards mediocrity."
(The above are taken from the internet)
Whatever race/culture we are from there should be a Common Courtesy Culture for us all in the Uk and the world, regardless of race, religion, skin colour, sexual orientation. However, Black Lives Matter (BLM) should be banned, as they are divisive and racist and are rehashing a dangerous already tested and failed political Marxist/ Communist philosophy. The have conflated it with Marxism (mixed it up) with racism and the Uk has passed laws to stop racism, but it is oppressing ordinary free speech as well i.e. asking someone "where are you from", or being deemed a racist just by being of white skin colour. The English in particluar are now not allowed to think or speak, as just by existing we are racist, i.e. unconscious bias and white fragility. Even though England is our own nation and immigrants came of thero own free will, can return if they wish, they all do have their own lands, some even have their own homes in these lands still, while also having obtained Council property in the UK where many English cannot now obtain these.
THE COMMON COURTESY CULTURE - WORLDWIDE.
Rights With Responsibility.
Play Your Positive Part In Life.
Please. Sorry. Thank you. Queue.
Smile. Live & Let Live. Forgive.
Be Polite, Even In Anger.
Agree to Disagree. Do Not Impose.
Submit to the Police.
Do Not Be Kind To Crime.
Clever Or Not, Be Humble.
Be Grateful.
Every Life Matters.
WHAT UNITES?.
*To be Free
*To be happy.
*To be well.
*To have food, water, shelter, companionship.
*To have peace of mind
*To have peace in the world.
*To have power over our own lives.
*To have work we enjoy.
*To have a goal that motivates us.
*To have a family. To belong.
WHAT DIVIDES?
Religion divides Us.
Political beliefs divide us
Language divides us.
Laws divide us.
Education and Knowledge or lack of it divides us.
Money and lack of it divides us.
Culture divides us.
Skin colour divides us
Not being able to speak freely divides us.
Our "thinking" affected by of all the above, and is the ultimate division.
WHAT HINDERS PROGRESS ?
*Human Nature and Emotions
*Some want power over others
Power for their own benefit, or for their group/race/culture
*Some do not care, as long as they are OK.
*Some tell lies, or manipulate to maintain power over others,
to stay in high office, a job or position, or to retain influence.
* Not obeying the rules/laws, or bringing in their own laws to oppress.
To Falsely Use Race, Poverty, Mental Health, Disability As A Means To Oppress & Make Gains
Asylum and Conflictive Human Rights.
Toxic Significant Celebrities/Leaders using influence to destruct others nations/groups
WHAT PROMOTES PROGRESS?
*Critical thinking on every issue, i.e. looking impartially at both sides of an issue.
*Live and Let Live attitude.
*Not getting angry/rude if someone disagrees with you..
*Free speech that allows dissent and discussion without rancour.
*We do not have to be right, we can "agree to disagree" Obey the great and small laws that keep society in peace.
Do not steal, murder, leave litter or dog fouling, play loud music in
communal or public places like parks, streets, trains, tubes, or communal gardens.
*We MUST have a RIGHT to ask "where are you from" and not be told it is racist to do so.
It's a simple "getting to know you" inquiry in any society, a chance to hear about your culture,
(that you want others to recognize and value), or just your life experience, to hear about its problems and benefits.
If you are of African, European, or any other heritage, to ask society to suppress this simple inquiry, is an oppression of the soul.
CONFLICTING EXAMPLES OF HUMAN & EQUAL RIGHTS WHICH CREATE STALEMATE FOR PROGRESS.
Right to family Life: Having more than 2 Children is a self imposed family & national poverty and will destroy the planet.(Worldwide leaders & individuals must take control of global warming and voluntarily have 2 or less children. Rich nations have 2 or less children, poor nations have 4 to 10 as the UK once did, when we were also poor)
Right to follow a religion: Yet Some Holy Book's (Qur'an) say a women can be "scourged" at times.(We will never stop terrorism/violence generally or against women if Human Rights Protect a Religion with such words) The Qur'an says its follow we should not "befriend Jews & Christians" which is racist/discriminatory.(We will never stop division or have racial integration with such words protected as a "truth" in a Holy Book).Cultures allowing Honour killing is murder. Female Genital Mutilation is child physical abuse.(There should be no "equality" to be claimed for cultures practicing the above, they are ancient tribal traditions based on a man made error of thought/belief/culture and should be taught as such in schools).
Black Lives Matter is Racist By Name and Seeks Anarchy/Superiority/Government Control, Not Equality.(Society will not progress with aims of defunding the Police, making hero's of criminals, burning the host nation flag, "raising the fist" against society, destroying the history and the features of a host nation by riot)
Transgender Teaching In Schools: Children should not be "taught" transgender, it is a minority group issue and some feel is a psychological/mental health/emotional issue as many who apply for this life option already have other mental health issues, i.e self harm, anorexia, bulimia, autism. It is also It is destabilizing ALL children, who will then think it is a choice they must/can make. Some do and then regret it. Psychologically, what child can deal with deciding if they are male and female before 18? Schooldays are full of bullies and it endangers children who may be easily led into this alternative lifestyle, creating unnecessary new mental health issues. One time "tomboy" girls will have pressure put on them "would you like to be a boy really do you think", they are likely to say "Yes" without having any idea what they are agreeing to, this may lead to notes in their school reports to counsel them on transgender and lead them into that lifestyle, children are very suggestible, as the quote goes "give e a child until 7 and I will show you the man/woman" i.e. what we learn in those first 7 years moulds us for better or worse for a lifetime. We can see from those who have committed serious crimes, that many have suffered great abuse or lack love and attention, it is hard to judge them as responsible sometimes when they have not experienced any norms of family life. We would be better teaching children about bullying and identifying this at primary school and counseling the bullies so they do not become adults that bully. Transgender issues should not introduced until 16 in schools. Research should be made on children living in same sex marriages and those who have chosen a transgender lifestyle. In the meantime there should not be medical or surgical options offered before 18, in this, Russia may be correct in withholding gay interactions before 18, perhaps 16 should be the time to allow serious discussion. We can be kind to minorities, but we should not be imposing minority choices onto the majority. We should be protecting children from peer and social pressures to "try out" minority group lifestyles that could affect their lifetime development and mental/emotional well being, sometimes leaving them in a state of "limbo" if they have life changing surgery/medication that cannot be reverses when they find they still feel at odds with themselves. It should be remembered that transgender are those who "think/feel" they are of the different gender or even "multi gender", we can automatically conclude it is psychological issue, the normal state of a human is male /female relationships in order to procreate.
Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant 5or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
Religion, Belief. Is There a God?
Belief is a powerful force in our lives, belief in ourselves to achieve something, and belief in a God. There are many religions and many deviations of each religion. Religions are often part of a nations identity and believed throughout that nation, which indicates that religions or "God" may well be a man made concept, as many believe is the case i.e. Is lslam is mostly in the Middle East, Chrsitinity in Europe, India has multiple "God's". Israel is Jewish and is uniquely both their national identity and religion, though many are secular Jews, i.e. they do not believe in God. Religion has created many wars and divisions in society and nations, even now, where it has become detrimental to society once again, creating terrorism, wars and oppression. Religion has always been toxic to society due to misunderstanding, the Bible & Qur'an in particular and when individuals do not read these books IN FULL themselves. We should not rely on preachers of any religion, they may not have read these books in full themselves either, then we develop deviations of each religion and become more divided.
Multiculturalism and Multi Religious society Is now again creating division in society, not unity. We should have known this already as Ireland has been divided with violence by Catholic and Protestant beliefs to the detriment of many. Northern Ireland now tries to unite school children in mixed Catholic and Protestant school classes to try and gradually resolve the divided adult society and the future society they will inhabit as adults. Bizarrely and dangerously, in England, we have now established Academy Faith Schools (promoting a particular faith in each school). It is another example of returning to policies that have been done before and which did not work. Ideally, we should have state schools (and private and Grammar schools) all with the same basic curriculum, or perhaps the Academy's we now have with specialty subjects like Drama, Art or the sciences for instance, but religious studies should always be a subject taught as part of the core curriculum covering ALL religions, without promoting any particular faith in any school i.e. ALL state, private and Grammar schools should remain secular. Religious practices should be taught at home by parents (as should cultural differences and history like slavery), or within their religious community only i.e. the Church, Mosque, Synagogue, Temple etc. The current Faith school Academy system in the UK (or England) is setting society up for a great division as the minds of children are being indoctrinated with ideas of God that may not be real
Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant 5or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
1“Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God;a believe also in me.
2In my Father’s house are many rooms. If it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you?b
3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also.
4And you know the way to where I am going.”c
5Thomas said to him, “Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?”
6Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
7If you had known me, you would have known my Father also.d From now on you do know him and have seen him.”8Philip said to him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.”
9Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
10Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works.
11Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works (miracles) themselves.
12“Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father.
13Whatever you ask in my name, this I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
14If you ask mee anything in my name, I will do it.
15“If you love me, you will keep my commandments.
16And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper,f to be with you forever,
17even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will beg in you.18“I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you.
19Yet a little while and the world will see me no more, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live.
20In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you.
21Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest (show clearly) myself to him.”
22Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, “Lord, how is it that you will manifest yourself to us, and not to the world?”
23Jesus answered him, “If anyone loves me, he will keep (retain, remember, believe) my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.
24Whoever does not love me does not keep (retain, remember, believe) my words. And the word that you hear is not mine but the Father’s who sent me.25“These things I have spoken to you while I am still with you.
26But the Helper, the Holy Spirit (Gods own invisible Spirit) , whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.
27Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid.
28You heard me say to you, ‘I am going away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.
29And now I have told you before it takes place, so that when it does take place you may believe.
30I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming. He has no claim on me,
31but I do as the Father has commanded me, so that the world may know that I love the Father. Rise, let us go from here.
It would seem that Spirit and words are interchangeable and we humans are the image (likeness) of God and Jesus Christ by having a spirit in us, which is the ability to think and speak. My words are MY human spirit which go forth as I speak with any person, and people might remember my words and are affected for good or ill by my words. My spirit lives with them as they remember my words, and as I remember their words and their spirit lives with me. With God's words in the New Testament spoken by Jesus Christ, these words are God's Spirit entering into us and staying with us if we believe them and hope/believe they are true. These Words also carry the creative power of God as do the Words of Jesus Christ, but only when we believe them, as even Jesus Christ did not do miracles when people did not believe he was the Messiah (anointed one) or Son of God. Elsewhere in the New Testament Jesus says God's will is that we live again after death and the words of Jesus are the "way" to obtain this life. Its the words that we believe that leads to life, and ONLY those words in the New Testament that Jesus spoke. The Quran does not have anything like these words and narrative of the gospel. It would seem that neither the Quran, nor any other religion will lead anyone to eternal life, simply because this is where the full story, the "words" are for everlasting life. These "words" say they will be proved to us, and proof of God, as we live our lives believing it, as miracles or other more subtle things occur.
And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which see's the Son, and believes on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day. John 6:40
But then again, others believing other Gods or stories about God say that miracles happen with them, so what can we say IS true? It matters whether we believe or not, it is the one of the key reasons the world is so divided and also so brainwashed we fear not believing or challenging our belief, in case God is angry and then end up believing things that are dogma, i.e. which noone is allowed to query or say is wrong. Yet those nations who do not believe in God, such as Communism, created the mass murderers Stalin and Lenin and the Gulag prisons in Siberia just because one challenged/queried the communist system. So do not think that abolishing the notion of God will make a better world, history has shown it will be as bad, or far worse. Even Christianity has brought child abuse, cruelty and The Spanish Inquisition, while Islam brings terrorism, ISIS. oppression of women.
IS THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION TRUE? MAKING ALL OTHERS UNTRUE OR INCOMPLETE?
We need take seriously belief and faith of the 3 main religions as they cause great discord and suffering in the world and as individuals if we get brainwashed without knowing thoroughly ourselves the books. I speak of Jews, Christians. Muslims.
Religion and Human Rights are a key cause of conflict in the world in the past and now,
these must be discussed and resolved for society to progress.
Please see: www.TurningTheTideOfTerrorism.com / www.ACertainMyth.com (or is it true).
SUGGESTED GLOBAL & UK POLICIES
Key Policy 1: Safely Change Parliamentary Politics in the UK and Worldwide by more “Independents” standing For Election.
Coalition Government Systems, or Proportional Representation do not work well. Little agreement is reached and Governments then fail as too many elections are then called creating instability. The Uk 2 party System of "first past the post" of (usually) Labour and Conservatives, also does not work well, as Labour creates Policies to spend Taxpayers money on the population to win their votes and gain power. These policies are usually not financially sensible/feasible and then the Taxpayer funds run out. The Conservatives win back power again (as in 2010) as the nation is in dire financial problems, and they have to sort the finances out again before the nation goes bankrupt. We currently swing from “left to right” Politics and each cancels out the others policies and we make slow, or no progress. If we have more "Independents" standing with their own Policies and/or adopting some or all of the Policies of the current Political Parties that they adhere to, they then stand as “Independent Labour”, “Independent Conservative” "Independent Green” "Independent Reclaim", etc. But "Independents" will not be part of any “whip”, as they will not need to go through the "vetting" process of a relevant Party if they are "Independent". Usually if any of us are selected by a Party to stand for them in an area, we are then obliged to vote according to the Party requirements, which is often against our conscience or "better judgement". There will also be "Independents “ who do not want to identify with any Party and want their own policies but with a mix of the various other Party Policies if they choose. Finally there will also be the "British International Independent Party" "Independents" (BIIP), taking on some, or all of these Policies on this website, and any others they wish to support of other Parties, and/or their own unique policies.
This way all "Independents" choose Policies that they believe will take Britain and the world forward , focusing not on the good for their party and what will get them elected, or for the good of THEIR culture, religion or race at the expense of the "common good" of the Britain and the World. Then a full range of ideas will be put forward for the future of the UK and the world, that those elected are free to support or not. Even democracy is "only as good as those elected" or even those voting, we all "think" and judge differently because of our age, experience, culture, religion, education, parental and societies input.
If the above system is successful, we could gradually have many “Independents” elected, then there will come a point when the following could apply:
When an election is over, the new MPs elect the Prime Minister (PM) out of all those newly elected MPs. The PM then elects his “Cabinet” out of all of those new MPs elected. Currently the winning Party elects the cabinet only from their own party. However, MPs and the public do not always agree fully with any one Party and its Policies, and we limit freedom of political thought and action and do not chose what is best necessarily.
We do not need the Government to set up this system, we can just begin by standing as “Independents” along the above lines and it will develop naturally. If this is what the public want, they will start electing "Independents" until most, or all MPs are Independents. In conjunction with this policy we must also bring in Key Policy 3 and 4 to ensure the public can vote with some knowledge This way we may leave behind left/right policies and Political Parties that make themselves “different”, only with damaging opposing policies, just for the sake of getting into power. If it works in the UK. other nations might follow, even the authoritarian regimes. The UK and the world needs to move forward quickly with good and sensible ideas, to include addressing the Global Warming problem. These ideas should not be hard to identify if we remove partisan motives, i.e. based only culture, class, woke or other preferences. We need to look at the resources, weaknesses and strengths of our own nation, and the problems and strengths of other nations. This to include Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Africa, South America, in order to create a NEW more inclusive prosperity and security worldwide. If we do not do this, it will be too late to regain control of Global Warming and potential worldwide national bankruptcy and failed nation status of even the successful nations. The UK and Europe and some other nations cannot sustain immigration of all the poor and war torn of the world, particularly if those that arrive as immigrants, refugees or Asylum seekers, still maintain large families they cannot afford but expect the Governments (the Taxpayer) to support. Even the rich "West" will not be able to sustain this. The "poor" also have to be "responsible" and only have children they can afford, i..e no more than two. There is an obvious but perhaps undocumented direct correlation between family size and poverty in the family, which flows into poverty for the nation.
Key Policy 2: Maximum 2 Children Per Woman
Africa is expected to double its population by 2050, the UK and EU population growth is only 3%. Africa is very poor, the UK and some of the EU has good health care and welfare systems and a good standard of living for most. There are poor in the UK, but this is mostly due to having large families or children born without the Father present. Sometimes several children are born to different Fathers, yet still there is no Father to support the Mother of these children. The Father also do not pay child support, then it is expected that the Government (the Taxpayer) pays. There must be responsibility of ALL from age 16 onwards to ensure a child is not born before age 25 ideally (we are usually not financially or emotionally secure enough before then) and there is an intent to remain with the Father of the child until the child or children is at least 12 years old. There is a direct correlation between family size and poverty in the family and then the nation. Worldwide we must ALL aim for maximum of 2 children or less, or none. Bangladesh has had success with this goal. The UK and other modern nations has access to birth control, and there must be assistance to other nations for this provision, with education on its benefits. The Western nations are renowned for generally only having 1 or 2 children per family/woman. It is obvious that there is a direct link that large families bring poverty to themselves, and then to their nation. There is great danger therefore in the mass immigration we are now experiencing in the UK and many of the richer nations. Made worse because immigrants still follow their own culture or religious preferences, by having large families, regularly 4 to 10 children, even when they cannot afford them. Britain, Europe and other nations will also become failed nations if family size is not addressed in ALL cultures and nations, including the English. Dealing with this is key to resolving Global Warming issues as well as family and national poverty. Marcus Rashford (whose Mother was a single parent with 5 children, his Mother West Indian), petitioned for food and facilities for the children of the poor, to be provided during school holiday’s as well as term time. I think the Taxpayer also provides breakfasts. This is an unprecedented unsustainable demand on the Taxpayer, for it is our own hardworking money we are spending. Only the rich can afford more than 2 children, and as we never know what will happen in life and we need to do reduce global population to reduce Global Warming. Marcos Rashford and others who promote free school meals to the poor, should also publicly promote 2 children or less for every family, for the sake for these children and their successful future. The Government and schools should also promote this. Parents must realize that it is their responsibility to feed and care for their children without relying on the Taxpayer to feed them and give the children the attention they deserve. If we do not do this, the Taxpayer i.e the Government, will go bankrupt and the UK will be as poor as Africa. Africa does not have free education, healthcare, welfare and homes, even water, soon the UK also may be this way. The water board in 2020 warned us that the UK may have water shortage in 25years i.e. 2040/45. Mass immigration is changing the nations thinking for the worse, we all think Welfare, Healthcare, Housing are unlimited, it is not, this is why we now have long NHS queues, no dentists taking new patients, not enough homes, fewer school places near where we live. All the world cannot flood to the richer nations and expect to live as they did before, because of the way richer nations live, is the reason they are successful, not because of slavery 200 years ago. The reason why poor nations are poor is because of the way they live now, not because or Slavery 200 years ago.
Key Policy 3: Baseline Politics and Economics Education. Key to Policy 1 working, is an educational website on basic politics for the public on the government website, and to be compulsorily promoted by the BBC and other media outlets. An example shown below:
Baseline Political and Government Financial Education at School And On-Line For Adults to inform us of the basic general political aims or ethos of each Political Party, also that they often do not meet their stated aims, but the opposite happens. Plus the past 50 years accomplishments and errors of the Political Parties and how the breakdown of Tax Spending is in the UK. To simply explain that it is the Taxpayer (not the Government), the ones who work hard, and ALSO the rich, who also work hard (often harder than most), that pay much of the cost for ALL of those on Benefit, Education, health care (NHS), the Police and Council services. These public services do not generate wealth, they drain it, which is why when Unions demand massive pay rises, it is the Taxpayer paying. Wealth for the nation, is provided by the taxes we pay. The Entrepreneurs, Trade and Business and those with unusual talent and financial success create wealth, new jobs, and the money we pay our taxes from that which then pays nurses etc. We all have free access to these Health & Welfare services even if we pay little or no Tax into the system. These services help those in particular who cannot create sufficient wealth for themselves to pay for these things, or even to live adequately. But it is not for any “poor” person to then have children they cannot afford, or not attempt work if they are able, or spend money on drugs, alcohol, excess or unhealthy food and then demand more from the “Government”, i.e. the Taxpayer. The Health & Welfare and Housing is to protect us in difficult times. People vilify the “rich” but it is the wealthiest 10% that pay for 80% of all these Health & Welfare costs for the majority of us. So we “poor” who may be relying on Rent or Housing Benefit, Council homes, Tax credits, Universal Credit, free school meals, health care, only receive this because of the clever and richer individuals who generate the trade and wealth of the nation. It is not a "right" that we have ANY children if we cannot afford them, we currently have 89'000 children in Council care. We should not be vilifying the rich, nor demanding endless pay rises, without this in mind. By the same token, the rich should have the attitude of gratitude that it is only by chance they are born with great ability and a stable home perhaps, coupled of course, with their hard work and making the best of their abilities and dedication. The “poor” and "rich" (of the English and all cultures), should also have an attitude of gratitude that we are in the UK, where we are usually not left to starve, we have a Police force and crime is not “rife” (yet, but Black Lives Matter want the Police defunded), or we can go to hospital or doctor free of charge. It for us to all take responsibility to live within our means, not spend spare cash on costly mobile phones, Alcohol, Drugs, Holidays, and not have more than 2 children, and less if possible, and not before age 25 ideally. This is for our own sake, and that of our children, nation and the survival of the planet earth.
Key Policy 4: “Baseline Education Degree By DVD for UK & Worldwide”. Compulsory for children from age 11 at school. This part of the Policy should be introduced in the last term of primary school, perhaps all day viewing within 4 weeks and with short voluntary discussion, and again at age 13 and then repeated at 16 perhaps for those teenagers that are not progressing academically, those excluded, or adults in prison. They could watch these DVDs or films on You Tube so that even the non academic, or not now in school, have a "Baseline" knowledge of the world and its major events and accomplishments. These should also be promoted worldwide and accessed free (the books will have to be purchased) so that worldwide we all have a similar "Baseline" Knowledge of Life and the World on which to build. We learn best by having a basic "baseline" and then we add to it as live day to day, or with additional study. Certain basic Knowledge gives us mental/emotional stability, and takes away inferiority, it allows those who cannot read or write to "know" basic issues and via DVDS or by You Tube, they can be watched numerous times in life. It will take away a "little" of the mystery between those that are academic and those that are not, and begin to remove that "divide". Just a little. Suggestions to start this off until specific briefer ones can be made maybe:
1) History of the World by Andrew Marr
2) The Wonders Collection with Prof. Brian Cox (Wonders of the Solar System)
3) The Story of Science Presented by Michael Mosely
4) Darwins Dangerous Idea presented by Andrew Marr
5) The Richard Dawkins Collection Presented by Richard Dawkins
6) A History of Christianity presented by Diarmaid MacCulloch
7) Jerusalem The Making of a Holy City Presented by Simon Sebag Montefiore.
8) World at War Series Narrated by Laurence Olivier
9) Life of Mohamed Presented by Rageh Omaar.
10) BOOK: Usbourne Politics For Beginners By Alex Frith/Rosie Hore
11) BOOK: Religion in Minutes By Marcus Weeks
12)The Worldly Philosophers by Robert HeilBroner
13) Big Ideas in Brief by Ian Croften
14) (Self help book title to follow)
15) (DVD Title To Follow on Slavery: Ancient to Current Day)
16) (DVD Title To Follow on Empires of the World from Ancient times to Modern Day)
17) ( DVD Title To Follow on A Brief History of Every Nation)
18) (DVD Title To follow on Basic Politics and Economics so that the public can vote with same basic knowledge at least)
Key Policy 5: Police Lives Matter V Black Lives Matter; New Guidelines/Law : How To Respond To The Police & Assist Them, And Be Safe.
1) Do not run
2) Do what they ask
3) Do not be rude
4) Answer questions politely
5) Remember they do not know if you have a gun, a knife, or are a terrorist, for appearances are deceptive.
6) If you are stopped by Police and are obstructive, rude or run, YOU are the one at fault and may be charged.
7) Police stop/investigate people of all cultures because all cultures commit crime. It is not racism.
8) Their job is to protect us and they risk their lives daily, help them to help you, and the rest of society.
9) Do your part, report anything suspicious and be a witness if asked.
10) Police are there to support the law abiding, not the criminals, do not behave like one and run.
11) Do not support any sort of criminal activity, report it
12) To riot to support a criminal who has been shot or died resisting the Police is supporting crime, that itself is a crime.
13) Do not be kind to crime, help prevent it.
14) Help the Police to help you.
Many of those currently shot by Police in the USA or UK have been criminals, including Floyd/Blake/Duggan for whom violent masses have rioted and caused damage. Floyd once took a gun to a pregnant women's stomach, are these the people we want to protect? They care not for the law abiding citizen, maybe those that riot are not law abiding (many wear masks when rioting) is this why they demand defunding of the Police? Many others have been carrying guns, on drugs, aggressively resisting Police (this includes those with mental health who also kill others), or running from the Police. Soon we will not have police willing protect the law abiding public and crime and corruption will be rife. If Police go out to work each day and they are faced with the choice of either being shot themselves, or shooting too soon and then facing a murder charge, understandably there will be none with integrity willing to be a Policeman. There are many in society that think those involved in crime should not take responsiblity for their actions, even a breach of traffic law is a crime, dumping rubbish is a crime, noise and nuisance is a crime. Many do not know what it means to obey the law and that to run with a gun or knife and then throw it down at the last minute IS obeying the law, or that running from the Police, ignoring them, or refusing a request from them is acceptable. It is not.
Key Policy 6. New Leadership Goals For All Youth In Schools & For Schools/Prisons/Promoting Of The Duke Of Edinburgh's Award For Those In Particular That Are Without Guidance At Home . The Award is was somewhat based on Six Declines of Modern Youth By Kurt Hahn (Founder of Gordorstoun School that the Duke of Edinburgh Attended). During his lifetime, Hahn summarized his beliefs about the younger generation at the time into six points, of which are collectively known as the Six Declines of Modern Youth:
Hahn also proposed four solutions to these problems:
"There Is More In You than You Know"
(Duke Of Edinbugh)
Key Policy 7 Strikes To Be Made Illegal, They Have Become A Legalised Blackmail By A Minority To Harm the Majority, Even the NHS Doctors Have Risked Lives In Strikes, now (2022) Nurses, doctors, lawyers, railways, post office workers, dockmen are all onstrikes or threatening strikes. This after Covid and now a Energy crisis due the war in Ukraine. Strikes are also a means to create revolution and destabilise the Government. Inflated wages create inflation and a vicious circle results. If we want revolution, it usually ends badly and the bullies and Marxists get into power which lead to bankruptcy and dictatorship. Instead we should set up an improved ACAS with public jury type system for major disputes. So a dispute is registered and then 6 or 12 Jury of the public called. Then a Union Rep, workers specialist for both sides to provide evidence, Parliament Representative to provide long term costs of a pay rise and economic situation. The Jury should be from the public with an equal mix of male/female and over 40 years of age. The alternative to this that Strikes are made illegal in the public services at least that the Taxpayer pays, and a wage review of public services every year is made, and this is binding as it is the taxpayer paying. Private companies can hire and fire as they like if anyone goes on strike, the mass redundcy of the P & O case should not be vilified if the business was near bankruptcy. A company can only exist if it is making money, and even now many Unions have unreasonable "rules" the companies or public service institutions cannot do to their staff.
Key Policy 8: We should establish a "School for Leaders" or a "Course for Leaders" starting at 16 on to "A" and degree level based on some of the ethics of Harrow, Eton distinguished Schools. It should be available throughout the Uk and to other nations by internet, and/or by setting up such schools/colleges in Africa and other nations, such as Venezuela, as agreed by those nations. To include how international trade works, and how to set up a small business with a tax system to allow new business to flourish. For instance in some EU nations, a new business must have about £50'000 before a start up is allowed, and from the outset, they are taxed monthly a high amount, so this is before any trading is done and profits made. Very few can start a business in this environment. It is new business that eventually creates larger business, and the jobs, and the tax income that pays the services for each nation, the Health and welfare and free education. This also may be why some nations do not flourish. In the UK it is very easy to set up a business and to sometimes to get Bank Loans if a good proposal is put forward to the bank. Obviously honesty is paramount, as corruption can interfere how such programme's work.
Key Policy 9: International Central Fund Set Up And Distributed to individuals on a “dollar a day” via Mobile Phones. If successful, to perhaps eventually include 75% or more of the Foreign Aid Budget currently paid to Foreign Governments, so that we gradually spread the wealth of the world to nations in poverty directly to the public and avoid the loss of money from corruption when paid through Governments. This should be coupled with repatriation scheme for those wanting to assist their original nation of origin to help it redevelop. This might mitigate the mass unsustainable and dangerous immigration to the West and Europe in particular. The West cannot sustain this influx of immigration without eventually failing themselves to the extent that even Foreign Aid will not be available to the poorer nations. Instead we can gradually improve opportunity and development in ALL nations. We should offer scholarships or resettlement schemes to those who wish to return to their own cultural nation, and if on welfare benefit in the UK, this could still be paid to them perhaps when repatriated so they can access homes at a cheaper rate and improved standard of living, as the welfare payments will buy more in these nations, as well as helping the economy and employment of that nation. It will also provide opportunity in these nations by taking this income and their talent and experience to their own nation. We could also introduce some system of small Financial Teams (not individuals) to be taught in the UK, EU, Australia, Canada (using the Foreign Aid budget sent to those nations) and then these teams sent out to assist in the developing the economies and to assist democracy and trade. If it is their own people, or people of their own heritage, arriving to assist it, will perhaps not be seen as interference that “white” nations are currently accused of. The Economist John Maynard Keynes saw ahead for us in his lifetime (1883 -1944) was “barring such catastrophes as uncontrollable flood of population or a totally destructive war, was not a continuation of the current state of misery and doubt, but a prospect so fair as to be almost unbelievable, nothing less than Adam Smiths heralded land of universal plenty (The Worldly Philosophers by Robert Heilbroner Page 288). We will all return to “misery and doubt” as the welfare system, education and law system fails due to the legal and illegal mass immigration into the UK and the EU, and if large families start becoming the norm. The West is renowned for 3 children or less families, it is the mainstay of the success of any nation. With 2 children, each has attention from an adult, none are left out of having to care of siblings, each child is more likely to get enough food, clothes, education. It is easier to support 2 children financially to have fun and enjoy them, than to have 3 or more, where one at least will be left out. China should be commended for their success on their 1 child policy which has transformed their nation from poverty and their educational rating higher than most cultures. Their policy was compulsory, which brought in bad practices and societies want boys rather so there is now a shortage of females. So such a policy needs to be voluntary and to cherish girls as much a boys to inherit, as the balance of society is interrupted.
Key Policy 10: Ban Faith Schools Which Divide Children And They Grow Into Divided Society: Ireland Is Trying To Mix Schools to “Ease the Troubles” In Their Society. Have We Learnt Nothing? Seek To Have A Standard Secular Education System. We want prosperity for all peoples, but we all have to abide by the same rules and aims and committed to the nation we live in, not the one we come from. The idea of establishing the was to abolish nationalism, i.e. the pride and competition and disputes between nations that brought the World Wars and other wars. I assume their aim with the Maastricht Treaty was to make all nations “mix” within all nations, so that we banish yet futher that “national” separation and we become more peaceful and prosperous worldwide. It has worked to an extent perhaps, we have had less wars in Western Europe at least, but this may have been because the whole world was exhausted with war and we had the Nuclear bomb as well, which meant human extinction if another war occurred. The downside is that the prosperous nations now have too much immigration, and multiculturism allows every citizen to promote and preserve their own nationality in the host nation they move to, including their language, their laws, their religion. Faith schools has made this worse, for now we now have ghetto type areas of certain cultures, mini foreign nations in certain cities. We have also had riots in the past along cultural lines in the UK. I do not think the English can be accused of racism when have been so accommodating that we are becoming a minority in our own land. In some cities, London, Birmingham, Slough, we are already a minority, with schoolchildren of ethnic minorities creating the extra pressure on schools and are 71% of the increase in school numbers. That means only 30% of the birth rate is of English parents, which means in a few generations England will not be English. The male English youth are academically also the worst performing in schools. Why is that? The singer Stormzy set up a fund to help BME (black minority ethnic) groups to achieve better in schools, but when someone offered funds for the poor performing working class English, this was not allowed as it was not “equal” opportunity and access for all. So we are increasingly having double standards that are always trying to raise the opportunity of minority ethnic groups, which is good, but not when racist and other laws are usurping any control or protection of the English in their own land. We should not be hindering anyone to progress, certainly not the English in their own land. 2015 : Pupils from ethnic minorities made up 71 per cent of the increase in primary school numbers. Almost one in three of England’s primary school children is from an ethnic minority — the highest level yet, figures show. One pupil in five speaks English as a second language, the survey by the Department for Education revealed. The growth in the number migrants, combined with a baby boom, is putting unprecedented pressure on schools. A growing number of primary schools have become supersized as they struggle to cope with the increase in population. In only one year there has been a 2.1 per cent increase in the number of pupils at state primary schools in England. This equates to almost 94,000 more children. Ethnic minority pupils made up 71 per cent of the increase. (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/one-third-of-englands-young-pupils-are-from-ethnic-minorities-jgt28h39qff).
Key Policy 11 With immediate affect the BBC must 1)Have a Warning/Information on all its screens and read out over the radio before every news bulletin: As follows: "The BBC is compelled by law to provide unbiased news and programmes if they carry facts and issues in discussion, or disputed opinions. Listeners should be aware that critical thinking on every issue must be used by the listener to ensure that they themselves investigate the opposing view of any issue in order that society moves forward and does not repeat the errors of the past." 2) With immediate affect as the BBC does not promote the opposing views yet and has become dangerously partisan with some key issues, the BBC should commission The New Culture Forum Channel, to show all those programmes's currently made by them and to be streaming indefinitely. The BBC must also commission them on certain topics to show the opposing viewpoint not being presented by BBC own staff. 3) The BBC is over represented by ethnic minority groups, or minority groups such as LGBTQ. Diversity is good but not if there are no English present at all and no English majority opinions allowed to challenge minority group opinion of Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ, women's rights, activist rights. If we are to have "black staff" employed because they are black, then 70% of staff should be English as the population is 70% English. The BBC covers the whole land not just London, which is now only 36% English. An outside overseer should ensure that staff percentages are balanced, my local co op for instance is all ethnic minorities. This should apply across the board for all industry, Police, Board Rooms, Military etc. However, ideally it should be by talent and experience only after the 70% white and the 30% ethnic minority be they white or black. We do not get a job because if are not good enough, or do not have enough experience. It is easy for anyone to lay the "victim" saying they did not get a position because they were of ethic group or colour, those who are good, with talent, presentable, can speak English clearly, do not have a negative "agenda" against the UK, will get a job. I did not get many jobs I wanted. That's life, not race. If the England is 70% English we have a "right" to have 70% of the jobs if we are giving out jobs by quotas.
Key Policy 12: 1) Investigate The London Mayor Sadiq Khan for Abuse/Misuse of Public Office and Funds and/or Breach of Trust: As Follows: Potential Evidence:
Sadiq Khan the London Mayor has been partisan with regard to Black Lives Matter in not acting in the best interest and safety of all London residents, and not even for Black residents, as they too were not advised by the London Mayor according to Government and Police ruling to stay at home prior to a Black Lives Matter Protest, risking Covid infection to their own lives as well as others. On 5th or 6th June on the Radio 4 Today Programme just before the BLM Protests on the 6th June 2020, when asked what he would advise the Protestors that day/weekend, he said twice "I am not attending the Protest as my Mother is self isolating and I do not want to compromise her, but I would not STOP BLM supporters from Protesting" . He said this twice as the Radio 4 Presenter pushed him on it. https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/mayor-of-london-statement-on-blm Mayor of London statement on Black Lives Matter protest 06 June 2020 The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: “To the thousands of Londoners who protested peacefully today (it was not peaceful): I stand with you and I share your anger and your pain. George Floyd’s brutal killing must be a catalyst for change worldwide. No country, city, police service or institution can absolve itself of the responsibility to do better. We must stand together and root out racism wherever it is found. Black Lives Matter. “To the tiny minority who were violent and threw glass bottles and lit flares - you endangered a safe and peaceful protest (it was not peaceful and the EDF came out to stop the defacing of even the Cenetaph) and let down this important cause.” Sadiq Khan while holding the office of London Mayor clearly encouraged a Protest and gathering of people in breach of the Lockdown laws. As he is not of “white” origin he was compromised in his position being openly partisan to the Protest and misusing his Public Office for the benefit of his preferred racial "group{s)". He did not act in the best interest for all London residents to avoid the spread of a deadly infection during the first Pandemic in a 100 years and before we had any vaccine or real control over the issue. It was the height of irresponsibility and personal bias which leads to corruption and he should be removed from Public office and banned from any Public Office again, vocally and vociferously stirring up racial divide from a Public Platform.
2) This has also led to second account of Misuse of Public Office and Public Funds by Sadiq Khan the London Mayor as he has in 2020 appointed a new diversity committee of 15 people paid by Taxpayers. There are 4 English and 11 are of the Black communities. The statues and road names are part of UK/ Britain whose history it is, It does not belong to just Londoners and certainly not to immigrants of 50 years residence. It is not for a violent BLM Protest Group and a biased London Mayor to make these changes. Does a summer of Protest in support of the death of criminal give them the right to change centuries of history (and its school curriculum), in a nation that they despise and wish to take over by a raised fist, burning the Union Jack and chasing our Police? This is anarchy. They say that the "Victorian" feel is not appropriate for modern London. This diversity goup are appointed to change Road names, erect and maybe take down (though they say not) statues/art. Will they put up a statue for Floyd who was a criminal resisting Police and once took a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach, or that of the temporary statue of the woman who helped tear down the Bristol statue with raised fist, so that the black children in this nation are inspired to do the same? It cannot be that 15 persons of which the English are not the majority, have power to make such significant changes. Yet even 15 is not enough to make such decisions, it should be the whole nation (of England at least), to decide what is removed from our London Capital (and its school curriculum), not 2'200 Petition signatures and a biased partisan Mayor and HIS chosen biased appointees. The salaries may well be £50'000 to £100’000 annually each member, then the costs of removing, erecting statues and artwork, changing road names, changing the curriculum. The cost of this unnecessary and very inappropriate when we are putting up National Insurance to workers to cover the cost of the Pandemic and people are losing jobs and business.
https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/arts-and-culture/commission-diversity-public-realm/diversity-public-realm-commission-members
"Statues of slavers around London could be pulled down under mayor’s new diversity plan. Sadiq Khan wants to review and improve "the diversity of public landmarks" after protestors toppled the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, will launch a new commission to review and improve “the diversity of London’s public landmarks” after Black Lives Matter protestors tore down a statue of slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol. Statues in the capital linked to slavery could be removed under the new initiative. “There are some slavers that should come down, and the commission "will advise on that,” Khan told the BBC. A petition calling for the removal of a statue of the 18th-century slave trader Robert Milligan by Richard Westmacott located at West India Quay in east London has garnered more than 2,200 signatures".
3) It should be considered that Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus the Director General of the World Health Organistation should also be removed from office as he also issued a statement from his worldwide platform that the Black Lives Matter Movement was an important issue and should be allowed to continue despite the Pandemic and risks to black lives and every life. If both the London Mayor and The W.H.O. Director General had fulfilled there unbiased service to ALL humanity, they would have stopped the breach of Lockdown rules from the outset. Instead they made a special case of their "own" compatriots showing themselves corruptible and unworthy of the power and influence invested in them by vote or appointment.
KEY POLICY 13: National Trust Properties, The Churchill Memorial Trust and many others are already changing Trust names, removing artifacts, removing articles written by Churchill on his website and changing memorial aims. This is all based on the Black Lives Matter movement who breached all social rules and lockdown during a worldwide crisis, with rioting and looting on behalf of criminals and demanding the defunding of Police, that they and the criminals who died did not submit to but ran from. Floyd was a man imprisoned for burglary and using a gun with intent on a pregnant wombs stomach. Yet the BBC, Intellectuals and Academics want us to change the British way of life, history, Law and Order, on the basis of criminals shot while running from or not submitting to the Law and Order of the nation and the Police who risk their lives for the public. If the figures were collated properly we would see there is no bias just that the black races think differently to the white race. We are brought up differently and they are in a nation they consider not there own, and are trying to live their way in another nation. It is not their fault of the child born here to immigrants., but it is a price they have to pay. They can return to their own nation, but a host nation cannot be expected to reduce itself to level being demanded in order to prove it is not racist or that an immigrant is fully at one with themselves in the host nation. If I am white in a white English nation, this is my culture and land, legal immigrants can live side by side with us on an equal basis but it is not an immigranst right to set up groups to undermine our flag, history, education, law and order. Thet can only do that if they take the UK over and make it their own nation abolishing the English, Welsh, Irish, Scottish. Yet immigrants already fight between themselves (Hindu and Muslims riots Leicester 2022) and in various racial disputes or gang warfare and religious groups, a Muslim believer from London travelled up Scotland following his you tube video, and killed him for his slightky different faith. similar but more extreme disputes occur in Syria, Ireland, Lebanon, Africa, so we already know the end result of competing cltures and faiths. Therefore , Black Lives Matter is regressive not progressive and should be banned, as should Meghan Markle and Harry who tell untruths but calling it their truth and seek to undermine the UK institutional system by false racial accusations. No one knows the real Truth, they say, except themselves, so they make it up as they go along, as they bear witness to each others storyline, be it a lie or truth. Meanwhile they and the Media, and people such as Oprah Winfrey make their money these stories, and only due to Harry's opprotunistic misuse of Royal Links and breaching Royal rules, i.e.no political activism and no monetising of Royal status is allowed by Royal Members. The very name Black Lives Matter is racist. We recently had (2021) ethnic children in the Pimilico College London saying during a riot/strike at the school, that the Union Jack was racist and was nothing to do with her. That flag represents the education she receives free, the health care and maybe the welfare payments she or her parents receive free, the peace and freedom we have in the UK that she and every other immigrant enjoys. There must be a halt and reversal of all these changes with immediate affect as the demands are based on anarchy, discord and regressive policies and will bring civil war here no one will win, least of all those fair minded hard working black and white immigrants who want to contribute to British society and progress of the world. and who are also being intimidated by Black Lives Matter supporters.
KEY POLICY 14: Housing Policy UK: We do not need to build more homes necessarily, we just need to stop a small number of people owning more than one home in the first time buyer range and Council & Housing Trust homes.
It was reported in 2018 that 2 million private landlords owned 5 million homes on "buy to let". https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/25/home-ownership-out-of-reach-for-2-million-uk-families-says-thinktank. The main reason why we have a shortage or homes to buy (which increases the demand to rent), is that too many people own more than their "fair share" of "first time buyer" price range of homes. Worse than this, rich foreign investors are buying them en masse from "Buy to let" landlords We need a law preventing this and that all "buy to let" are sold individually when put on the market, and perhaps only sold to UK passport holders. I have known visa holders with their visa due to expire in 6 months to purchase a first time buyer property. A "fair share" is one property per couple/person, instead, now a few clever individuals have 2 to 100 first time buyer range homes, or more, a person in Kent where I come from bought 1000 "buy to let" homes which he then sold en masse to 2 overseas investors. That is a 1000 young couples without a home to buy. Buy to let has been curtailed a little, but it needs to be stopped completely as there are many companies dealing just in "Buy to let"., depleting "first time buyer" priced homes
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/buytolet/article-3352735/Britain-s-biggest-buy-let-tycoons-strike-deal-sell-900-strong-property-empire-Kent-Arab-investors-250m.html // https://www.simplybusiness.co.uk/knowledge/articles/2022/01/huge-rise-in-buy-to-let-property-companies. If "Right to Buy" of Council AND Housing Trust properties continues, we will compound the Housing shortage yet again. These homes were designed for those who could not afford to buy, but so they could access low rents, decent homes and have security. If they reach high salaries of £50'000 then they need to find a new security in private purchase, unless they are a key worker.A new survey indicates that first times buyer numbers have fallen from 33% to 22% and buyers of second homes has doubled. The second homes are also probably via "buy to let" Mortgages. Such a buyer only needs a salary of £25'000 and they can buy infinite homes on buy to let, though some Building Societies cap it at 5 now I think now, even that is too many and it is not a law anyway I do not.
We should consider the following and activate a change with immediate affect, it costs nothing in building, but releases millions of first time buyer homes and protects them being sold to a few clever people, or overseas investors:
1) Stop "right to buy" of Council and Housing Trust properties (Michael Gove is currently now advocating "right to buy" for Housing Trust properties, compounding the housing problem yet again)
2) If a Council or Housing Trust tenant has a £30'000 or £50'000 salary they must vacate the property (unless a key worker), these homes are for those who cannot generate that sort of salary. This would release homes for the less well off. The RMT Union Deputy Leader has a salary of £78'000 but lives in a Council Home. This is not right.
3) Create a law that "buy to let"mortgages of first time buyer homes up to £500'000 are illegal.
4) Create a law that "Buy to Let" homes must be sold singly and not en masse to 1 or 2 investors and must be sold to those with British passport, at least first time buyer range anyway (i.e up to £500'000)
5) Encourage Buy to Let owners to sell their properties by giving a tax exemption from capital gains tax for 1 or 2 years, or some other incentive to get some of these 5 million (probably more now) homes onto the property market again for couples/individuals and not investors. This might bring the rental and sale price of property down again due to more supply and less demand.
6) It could be considered that foreign investors are no longer allowed to buy property in the UK, so that builders build for the home market with cheaper smaller less luxurious property, rather than luxury homes that stand empty and owned by overseas investors.
7) It could be considered that those on the Council Housing list and/or on benefit can still be paid benefit even if they return to their nation of origin, or any other EU or other nation willing to accept that situation. Some nations have many homes but no income, it may generate work and innovation in these nations. The money for this could be taken from the Foreign Aid budget. It has already been suggested by some that those nations not willing to take failed Asylum Seeker backs, that nation will no longer receive Foreign Aid. This also should be a new policy.
KEY POLICY 15: Transgender/Human Rights/Equality
Key Policy 16: Education on the British Empire, Slavery, Black History: The same should be done about the British Empire and slavery which I believe is now being taught in schools since the Protests of Black Lives Matter, after demands that their history is also taught. I do not not think time should be spent specifically on another nations history until pupil subject choices come into play i.e. 16 . We have 100 plus races/cultures we have in the UK, to teach on one culture issue (Afro Caribbean Slavery), this is not "equality". This is a political movement and the public should also be aware of what schools are being taught, including Transgender and left wing woke politics.. My concern also is that these are being being taught by the black community or those with a bias against Britain and with a "revenge" and anti British slant which will create division and protests as we saw in the Pimlico School where a girl was quoted over the Media as saying that the Union Jack was racist and "nothing to do with her". This was not balanced with the fact that as an immigrant her education was free and she was living freely in the UK by her parents choice with free NHS care and maybe welfare. That there have been maybe 1000 empires of different size and length since modern civilization began maybe 4 to 5 thousand years, and much slavery also throughout that time. Britain happened to be one of the last Empires and the nation that brought slavery to an end worldwide, as we were not the only nation trading in Slaves. Slavery was brought to an end at considerable cost to the nation as the Slave Traders had to be paid off and I believe the Taxpayer have only just finished paying this. In addition, the black nations have also dealt in slaves. Due to the bias of many and the partisan nature of those that may teach on this subject, it should perhaps be online for all too see and hear the balanced view and history in order that bias and a new war of revenge is not sown in the black and perhaps white youth. The BBC is also providing a biased view on this subject and cannot be trusted to balance the facts. The black community are also now demanding compensation. The UK and USA and many other nations pay millions in Foreign Aid to assist the African and other nations and that is the only fair way to move forward. There is a case for paying some or all of that foreign Aid directly to individuals as a type of welfare payment via their passport ID and Mobile phone, so that they can begin to develop business and employ people. Currently much of Foreign is wasted or lost to corruption in foreign governments or leaders: Please see Key Policy 9.
All Rights Reserved | Linda Godden