BRITISH INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL PARTY     

"A Clever Person Solves A Problem. A Wise Person Avoids It"  Albert Einstein     


FLYING FREE FOR ALL NATIONS

Have A New Vision.  Change Your Thinking. Change Britain. Change The World. 

 Not Right. Nor Left. Just What Is Best…For Progress.  Progression Not Regression.

Every Life Matters. Police Lives Matter. Free Speech Matters.

"Do Nothing By Strife, Or Vain Glory"  Matters. 


  "The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking.

It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.” 

 Albert Einstein


*....and our thinking is being changed to woke....and we will regress, not progress, as some are deplatformed, lose their jobs or bank accounts and soon maybe even their homes  because of their political and other views.

Now the English "white" race must be subservient to all other races in their own land, this too is racism, yet

we are expected to  tolerate even this.


We Do Not Care If You Are Black Or White, Rich Or Poor. We Care Only, That We All Obey The Law.

That We Respect The Police Who Maintain It For Us, And Are A Considerate Citizen To All.

Love The Nation In Which You Live And Respect The Flag It Flies. Otherwise, What Have You Come To Do?

Wherever You Are, Seek To Build Peace & Prosperity WORLDWIDE, And Play Your Positive Part.

Do Not Tear Down To Destroy.

 WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE AND WHERE IS HERE? 

Democracy is not perfect but it is a  system that allows nations to progress economically, scientifically and in technology, improving health, welfare and its people being  free to live and speak without too many restrictions or fear.   There is a now a problem that we  may have too much democracy and   no rules on anything, even whether we are male or female,  or that some can be exempt from Police procedures due to their race, or we can have as many dogs as we like in densely populated cities which will become a public health issue, or  music can be played at volume on street pavements, parks, trains tubes.  Now  some of us can no longer safely ask "where are you from?"  for fear of giving offense and losing our job or reputation.   However,   to avoid poverty and to save  planet earth,    democracy  also needs to  include reducing family size nationwide and worldwide voluntarily, even though others say a decreasing population is not good due to our aging population and we need immigration for economic "growth", but we  cannot keep supporting "growth" in all its previous forms due to the demands on the planet.   We have  to expect less in order to save the planet and the many   poverty stricken children and nations.  African and other poor nations do not make financial  progress, not because of slavery 200 years ago, but because  they have large families they cannot afford and cannot trade easily due to lack of knowledge or corrupt leadership. We need  to reduce  the  world population  from 8 billion in 2022 (and rising 1 billion every decade) to 4 billion, even as recent  1960 it was only 3 billion. This policy  alone could  save the planet and with a better chance that  every child is educated,  housed, with a job and enough water and food, perhaps even a minimum welfare payment from 18.  The people of the world could take control of  this themselves just by doing it regardless of the Government and   by word of mouth and by  what they choose for family size.  Governments could promote it in their home nations for their  population AND for all refugees/Asylum seekers that arrive,  and  for Foreign Aid to  assist with contraception worldwide,  and  to break down religious and cultural barriers  generally and those that are against contraception. It is no good having children, even if supposedly by God's command,  if the children  suffer or do not survive.  Africa's population by 2050 is due to double, the UK to grow only by 3%, this is because the English in the UK (and some other European/Western nations) have  on average have  2 or less children per woman/family.This is likely to change in 10 years or so as  African and other cultures  arrive  legally or illegally into the UK   but still have 3 to 10 children. They  then demand the taxpayer feed and house their large families, as is currently the case, Marcos Rashford  promoted  Taxpayer support for children during holidays as well as school term. His  Mother was an immigrant and had 5 children, and he suffered, it is the choice of parents that must change, not that the the Taxpayer pays. Western nations have prospered due to  2 or less children, many children are sent unaccompanied from abroad and end up in the UK  Council Care system,  which is no life for any child. They  suffer, maybe for life.  New immigrants  do not  realise that being allocated a Council property is not a "right" or opportunity   that  we all are  offered, only  a very  few,  many  English  also  need these homes,  but do not get them because so many immigrants have arrived with greater needs and many children. The English may also wait 10 years or more for one, but  most are not allocated  points  to  even access/bid on any  property.  With smaller families  the Taxpayer can then  afford to provide free health care and education to their population and lists will reduce in housing, NHS, schools. We have seen the phenomenal economic success of China  in reducing poverty and creating prosperity due  their one child policy. That was an enforced policy and the people  are not  a free society as the Western democracies, but that does not mean we should not take note of their success in curtailing their population, 100 years ago the UK was also very poor when families were 5 to 10 children.  We should now seek  a voluntary policy of  2, 1 or zero  children  in the UK and worldwide,  if only  for the survival of  the planet and the parents that struggle to provide for them, and to reduce the suffering of  vulnerable children. This should also be combined with a policy of advice to young people to have  no children before age 25 to allow greater emotional, psychological and  mental security and chance for each young adult  to be live independently and be free of  the  responsibility of children.  A child is a lifetime of sacrifice and responsibility  and teenagers do not realise this until its  too late, by then they are locked into poverty with children they cannot afford.The above also increases the chances of  choosing a partner that will be for life, or at at least until the children have reached 18, or 11 at worst. It should be common knowledge that  both parties in a relationship  should use contraception, as the pill is not 100%  successful, I have known of 5 women where it  is has failed.  A child should  not be conceived until  your partner  is known to you ideally  for 12 months, or 6 months at least,  and ideally when you have both decided you want that relationship for life.  If you doubt the commitment of marriage or civil partnership with a person, a child  conceived early in life with someone we  decide later we do not like, means they will still have rights to see the child,  this may upset any new relationship either party will have, it is a lifetime pressure. It matters that we wait until we  decide  to marry or have  a civil partnership.  In reality, accidents of  conception happen, but if we  promote this advise nationwide and worldwide,  particularly to the young, we help them   to avoid poverty and discord in their lives, sowing the seeds for a happier life, not a life of poverty and discord for both parents and children from an early age.  As for needing immigration, or higher birthrate that some nations  are suggesting, they say some western nations have a high elderly population that cannot be supported by the Tax collected  by the increasingly shrinking younger population, this may be true. If we just do the same again i.e. more immigration with lower salaries and promoting more births, we should think of alternatives, i.e. if we do the same thing we will get the same result,  ballooning population, climate crisis, increasing poverty for the majority.  What is the alternative? I have been a NHS nurse and a patient. We are kept alive by medications  and suffer in other ways. Much of NHS healthcare is dealing with side affects of the medication we are on, at its worst we have dementia where our body functions but our brain does not. Many spend 5 years or more  in a care home with no awareness of self or family, it is a living hell for all concerned. We must have the option of "assisted dying" which  is by choice and verified by 2 doctors for those with terminal illness, the patient chooses the time for themselves, they may not choose it, but like abortion,  it should be there for those that  need to due to great pain or suffering, or difficult circumstances.  It should not be for the healthy to decide for the sick that they must suffer to the end, nor for  the  person not carrying a child to decide whether another should keep a pregnancy, it is  for  pregnant women  who must take care of it, and her conscience to make  that decision. Life is hard at the best of times, for some they consider  it is better not to have been born. We often hear of a great trauma by parents who wish to keep their child alive against medical advice, these parents are not always thinking of the child who faces a lifetime of suffering, and the parents are often not the ones caring or paying  for that child.  Technology is such that there must be some way that we can reduce our  world population  so that some have a little less and some have a little more and that we all have medical care, a home, a basic income, but  to allow those who wish to thrive if they have the talent, so that progress can continue. Progress for all, not as a form of power and superiority, as even talent/academic ability is God given/ luck/ chance, but it takes effort by those individuals to develop their talent. We should not vilify/condemn the rich/talented  any more than the poor, we  all need each other, the skilled and unskilled. The priority is that  throughout life all may have the opportunity in life to grow and develop their talent and to make money from it, and  to be taxed, but not so much that it takes away all incentive and  while the poor have 6 children they cannot afford  and then expect that hard earned tax by others  to be spent on those children  when they have had 2 to make sure they can afford them.   Equally, we should not  be banning Grammar schools that allow the  talented but poorer children to work their way to  a better  financial place in life, nor to take away charitable status  of private schools which allow a better education for those that can afford it. Education is key to progress, these policies are a form of vindictiveness or "dumbing down"  by those that suggest them i.e.  I cannot afford/ do not have the talent,  so you cannot have it either. We need everyone's talent, academic or otherwise. The UK has an education that allows further education  wherever you live  and what ever talent we may have, it is then  down to the child or adult do with that as they wish. Oppressing others to save the oppressed is not progress.

"It is important for the common good to foster individuality: for only the individual can produce the new ideas which the community needs for its continuous improvement and requirements — indeed, to avoid sterility and petrifaction"

Albert Einstein 


John Maynard Keynes (Economist 1883-1944)  “Barring such catastrophes as uncontrollable flood of population or a totally destructive war, was not a continuation of the current state of misery and doubt,  but a prospect so fair as to be almost unbelievable, nothing less than Adam Smiths heralded land of universal plenty "(The Worldly Philosophers by Robert Heilbroner Page 288). We will  ALL return to WW2 and  pre-war “misery and doubt” if the welfare system, education and law system fails even in the UK due to the legal and illegal mass immigration into the UK.  If  immigrants continue with large  families in the UK,  the UK islands will eventually  not be able to house, feed, provide water, health care and education for anyone. We will  ALL enter poverty en masse and we will ALL regress. The UK is 2.4 Trillion debt, this is not normal, it is not the time for strikes of 19%/35% salaries stoking inflation or  new Europeans wars,  or woke policies that gives people jobs and opportunities by race, colour, gender, it should ALWAYS  be by merit, or mankind will  NOT survive, we will just be giving power to those who cannot cope, or those with a racial agenda like Sadiq Khan (Muslim Pakistani)  the London Mayor who did not speak out  to deter Black Lives Matter protesters  going out during Covid lockdown  in order to protect all Londoners from a deadly virus, and Tedros Adhanom  (Ethiopian) the Director General of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) who did not condemn the Black Lives  Matter   protests in the USA or elsewhere but said it was an important issue and they should be allowed. He was in charge of the health of the nations and  announced  massive public  protests can go ahead.  This is racial bias and  partisan  behaviour and typical  of decisions made by  dictators, and why the  African nations do not progress, because  the decisions made  are biased/corrupt. As indeed are many white Academics promoting woke ideology that suppresses truth and free speech. Both of  these man should be charged with Abuse of Power in Public office and removed from office, but they remain despite these abuses.   Now in many Western  nations see some new  history being taught in schools without any parental involvement,  positive discrimination for black lives to access positions in boardrooms and university places but with a lower grade. This is called "dumbing down" and will lead to corruption and poor service in every area of life. It is hard to find good leaders and teachers even with good grades or experience, if positions are given just because of race or colour then we will get the same result as from  the above  2 men. They and others  despise the UK, or the English  "white" occupants in particular.  They will only be happy when they control the government and all its institutions and the English have left, and made the nation Muslim, by then there will be civil war and disorder as they will have defunded the Police and there will be no law and order. They will have  made hero's and  statues of  people like Floyd and Duggan for their children  to emulate , who were  criminals killed by Police during a crime. Floyd once took a gun to a pregnant woman.s stomach during a robbery, so instead of being killed by the Police the society will be killing each other and far worse. We in the UK are being asked to subdue our legitimate  objections to this and be insulted by people like Ngomi Fulani who was given access to the King at charity reception and refused to answer a simple question or "where are you from" feigning offense to someone merely interested in her charity and her nation of origin.  Well actually, we have had enough of this stupidity that is being endorsed by our  leaders, and we  also to claim a right to be offended  and object to submitting  way to stupidity.


We now have (2023)  " a  catastrophe of an uncontrollable flood of population" warned against above and  we will regress into poverty and crime unless we create a new way of co-habiting and progression forward. We need a political change to gradually bring in more  Independent MPs that any  Prime Minister can appoint to his team  if he so  wishes including those in the usual Political Parties.  It is a level playing field, they can promote themselves equally by website, by you tube, have equal slots on TV and radio, and as is currently the case equal  access to a one   leaflet postal drop. Potential applicants  should not win just because they have more money, or they have some union/newspaper backer.  There  must be an introduction of Direct Democracy, or Polity Polling , where significant  issues are put forward to the  passport holding public who  can  vote on the internet and possibly  as normal  referendum by polling. These referendum questions should always have  10 minute  video clips on the pro's and cons of each question by those in the  Government who are dealing with the department in question and/or a third parties like The New Culture Forum or GB News, or perhaps any  interetsed party.  The public and others  can  also put up their own 10minute video clips on you tube.    Referendum questions for instance: 1) "Shall the UK  unilaterally, or with Greece and Italy,  call for a Moratorium on Asylum and all immigration to the UK "   the Home Secretary should provide a video. and someone in Government  with an opposing view should counteract with another video.  2)  "The  BBC does not adhere to unbiased reporting and surreptitiously  promotes  policies/stories  it supports.  Should we  a) remove the License Fee  so that the Taxpayer no longer funds this corporation and only allow  use of the name BBC for the World  Service and no purchase of the BBC name allowed.  3) Should we make  it illegal  for Transgender teaching in schools until age 16, and also use of teaching tools from Transgender groups cannot be used. Nor should schools  promote  transgender medication or surgery,  or a child be allowed to obtain these services  until 18 years when  they can make their own choice?  These issues must be dealt with at home and via GP until age 18 when the child can use the GP files for a potential transgender  change from age 18 following counseling for at least 2 years. There should be no self identifying. The schools should not be involved in  teaching this matter at all, it is a form of grooming/brainwashing of vulnerable children en masse.    4)  Uk Police are being politicized and have no time for real crime. Should we remove all tasks of discrimination and race related speech or incidents  and resort to police  intervention only for actual attack / assault,  which is actual  crime as most understand it. Should we also pass a law that clarifies that  "running from the Police, avoiding capture by use of car. or electric bike or scooter, or refusing to comply, by a  child or adult,  will not mean the Police will be charged but  those running will be deemed guilty for obstructing Police  whatever the race of the person.    Also that stop and search will be allowed whatever race of the person,  otherwise there is no equality or justice,  only the excuse of  diversity that allows some to have special exceptions to law and order which is not acceptable or just.  5) Should  council homes only  be allocated to the UK born, not for immigrants or refugees that are not  always refugees and often come with money, or paid a  lot of money to arrive, more than I could even save while in the UK so they are not poor, but come to claim housing, welfare, health care, making these services unavailable to to the Taxpayer who has paid for them.  However, it  is many of our  leaders (not all)  and the BBC that have abused their power and brought us to this place where opportunism has nearly given away England. there might be time to save it, it depends what happens at the 2024 election, before and after.





“THE END GAME - 2023”

(Woke, Black Lives Matter,  & 89'000 children in Council care)

What shall we do

So many pass through

Hands held out

For bread and stout.

 

Fleeing from war

Or an empty store

Not wanting to play

The game we say.

 

What do I mean

It’s all a dream

To those that come

They call for Mum.

 

And feed from the breast

Of taxpayers fest

Thinking it’s theirs

To allay their dares.

 

The English are told

We have to be sold

To maintain the flow

Of infinite dough.

 

As houses are filled

By demand of will

The English sit tight

Ready for flight, or fight.

 

Many children are born

That no one has sworn

To feed or love

By the glorious Dove.

 

But the Dove is made black

And put in a sack

As now we must see

What we believe.

 

Many children are born

To teach in the storm

Now they  have knives

And evil eyes.


For what we have done

Under the Sun

The English I mean

And the immigrants  dream.


The reality is

There is a twist

The dream is far gone

No longer switched on.

 

It’s all in the past

Time passes so fast

Many children are born

Now forlorn.

 

Not wanting to play

The game we say

Obeying the Law

Not being poor.

 

Many children unfed

No Taxpayer left

The English oppressed

The language bereft.

 

What did we do

So many passed through

The demand so great

On the State.

 

Even our own

Corrupted seed sown

Eventually war

Poverty and poor.

 

Racism or realism

Both are a prison

At the end of the day

We all have to play

 

The game we say

A certain way

Not yours or mine

But the sublime.

 

Submit and progress

Though we have less

Discuss and dispute

Sometimes refute.

 

Not shut the door

Of the jaw

We agree or not

It matters a lot.

All sides must speak

Or the nation is freaked

Distorted by power

We raise ourselves lower.

 

Woke will force it

Make us see fit

Then will torch us

Under the bus.

 

Is there a war?

Someone is poor

Is there a peace?

Poverty has ceased.

 

The child will suffer

For there is no buffer

Deserted by you

Your love not true.

 

The child is the nation

Stops at the station

You forgot to love

No hope from above.

 

They turn on despair

Into a fare

Of crime and theft

Then left bereft.

 

Because you gave birth

When there is no mirth

They tossed and turned

Eventually spurned.

 

England's lost speech

Supposedly freaks

And Masters of power

Yet holding flowers.

 

There is no privilege

We all under siege

These  words of war

At their core.

 

England is bereft

The English have fled

Or died in the war

Of empty store.

 

What shall we do

So many passed through

The English oppressed

Till nothing was left.

 

Was that the aim

Of all that came?

We gave what we could

It was not all good.

 

But look to your past

It goes so fast

Look to your present

From where you have been sent.

 

It is no  better

Look at the letter

Of history

Mankind’s misery and victory.

 

None can survive

None will thrive

If  "rights" prevail

Hammered by nail.

 

That riots and rules

By anger and fools

Disbanding Police

Law, order, ceased.

 

Who is to blame

If we all the same

It’s not quite true

I think not like you.

 

Watch what you speak

Watch what you seek

If you oppress

We all become less.

 

We all work hard

We all play our part

For good or ill

Stop. Think. Be still.

 

Thinking is fun

Think freely as one

It alone is the key

For VOLUNTARY  harmony.

 


LEO ROSTEN 

“The purpose of life is not to be happy, but to matter, to be productive, to be useful,

to have it make some difference that you lived at all”


“Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.”

Albert Einstein


Which includes being free to ask "where are you from" to whatever depth we might mean it.

How can can we learn about each other, to interact sincerely with each other,

if we purposely hide our origins while also wanting others to celebrate our origins?

How can the Police and others do their job without this question?

This issue is a "watershed moment" for racist or reverse racist "thinking".

We cannot submit  to this attack on  the very basics  of free speech, 

It will  stifle growth, harmony and the safety of society.

It is a step too far, for  to hide ones origins is often hiding crime or devious activity.

Why would anyone hide where they are from, their actual place of birth, or ancestry.

We are  a multi racial society and we are  expected to celebrate it , even the host nation culture.

We should not withhold our origins, that too can be  racism.

Particularly at a social  events.


The UK is already 2.4 trillion in debt and its  services already strain, we are on the  brink of collapse  and we will be a third world economy in a decade if  Law & Order breaks down and external  investment ceases, which eventually  means no jobs, pensions or welfare benefits for anyone.  It was announced recently (Jan 2023) that for the first time there are more people in the UK receiving more  in benefits than they pay in  tax. This means the Taxpayer is supporting them even though working, and   the benefit, welfare and health system will not survive, perhaps even  the education system, then there WILL be poverty and crime.  We have thousands of Asylum seekers crossing the Channel  who are unskilled, not speaking English,  possibly criminals and wanting homes, food, Legal Aid, Health care all  free of charge and jumping the queues for services  because they have nothing, but many born in the UK, of any ethnicity, do not have much either. If we pay tax we are  collectively paying for these services , those not paying tax will  get services free and hinder those who are paying due to the  increased demand they bring. ALL those born in the UK need to pay attention to this as it will affect you directly. The various health, housing, education systems will not sustain this demand  and it will collapse, it is already beginning.   Not because of mismanagement,  but because we have an  uncontrollable flood of people into the nation that are costing a great deal of  money and we cannot stop them arriving, this is  normally called an invasion, but we are not allowed to say that, to say what is true, what is fact. These problems are  partly because France is escorting  them to cross the Channel instead of turning them back,  and the EU generally do not, or cannot stop refugees/asylum/economic migrants   crossing their borders. It is  mostly due  to  Asylum  no longer being  viable for ANY nation, it  now just gives people  a  legal "narrative" to invade whatever nation they choose.  Those  nations then have  to pay to house and  feed them according to international law, even though illegal immigrants have spent thousands paying criminals and passed through many other "safe" nations before arriving in the UK. They put themselves  and their children into unnecessary danger  in a  small boat, some have even  been housed in France or Turkey  already.  Those who fail asylum,  they then refuse to return to their home nation,  having destroyed their passports,  or just disappear into  UK society to commit crime to survive, or are victim of crime, thre seems no answer.


We all must be concerned about  this, both the resident immigrant and  the English, Welsh, Scottish, Irish,  no nation has unlimited money, be it the  UK, EU, USA, to support thousands/millions  who just turn up from another nation.  The UK, EU, USA  are  also now  involved in an  indirect  war  assisting the Ukraine which is costing money in "arms" and has  also  created an  energy crisis affecting us all  due to sanctions the West has  made against Russia. This has created economic and energy  issues and inflation. Yet the Unions and Labour politicians,  mislead the public saying it is the fault of the Government only and encourage strikes for higher pay, which will only make the problem worse. They do this not for the benefit of workers, but to cause the Government to collapse in order to gain power. Even if Labour get into power this way, they will still have the same problems, and they also cannot spend money as we will still be 2.6 trillion in debt, and this could easily tip into bankruptcy and we will be like Venezuela, no jobs, no health care, crime rife and people fleeing to the USA.   Inflation is 10%/11% now (Feb 2023) and was  due to fall hopefully  by September 2023 , yet nurses strike for 19% pay rise,  putting lives at risk when the starting  (training) salary is around £24,000, average salary is £35'000 and other salaries go up to £50'000 or more, Teachers are much the same. As for Doctors asking for a 35% rise   "A junior doctor in their first year as a foundation doctor will receive basic pay of just under £29,400, with earnings typically rising to almost £37,000 after taking into account payments for extra duties. Second-year doctors earn an average of £43,300" (Google).    Junior doctors at this rate are in their first year after training and are gaining experience,  the salary goes up each year, these strikes go against their contracts and their oath not to harm patients. We have just had Covid and extreme costs due to that,  with 6 million plus patients already on the waiting lists (now 8 million (Oct 2023).  We have a war and an energy crisis and spike in inflation, we are all suffering yet doctors and nurse strike  at this time,  cancelling yet more  operations and appointments making the waiting  lists even longer and directly endangering lives, many have already died.  This could be deemed premeditated  manslaughter. The problem for the NHS staff is overwork due to understaffing  and massive salary hikes will make this problem worse as there will be less staff employed,  not more.  The NHS is not for  profit unlike the USA,  where there is very little free health care, also Australia, even in the EU some  have basic  rate tax of 25% to 40% and they may  have better pensions, homes. The UK  basic tax rate is only 20%, doctors, nurses, teachers and other professions  would very soon lose the  benefit of higher salaries if we then had to switch to these higher tax rates.

 

We must cease and desist on strikes for unrealistic salaries which fans inflation, we have to cut back for  a period, and also start realising as a society, that statistics show that parents financially  tend to manage with 2 children but often start tipping into poverty with 3 children. These strikes are a cynical design  by Union leaders who  seek political power via the Labour  Party who are Marxist, Communist, Socialist. These political theories were tested and   failed in 1989 when the Berlin wall came down and when Venezuela collapsed in 2014. These theories are  still  pursued by Russia and China. Do we  want a society like these and run  by such leaders?  Labour  will spend and  Unions will strike until we are bankrupt, they have  always done this before in this last 50  years,   every time. Even the Conservatives have had to spend money due to exceptional problems with  Covid and the Ukraine war and the resulting  energy crisis. The BBC  do not air these  related  problems  we are facing when interviewing  Unions and the NHS staff  or  the public.  We just hear "the UK is rich we can afford it"   "the nurses, fire service, teachers deserve more". We all may deserve or like more, but they have reasonable salaries  already and the NHS is not a  private profit making company. In the private sector we only get a pay rise if the company is making a profit, and we are given a job, only if  our own contribution is more useful than others they could employ.


The problem is we are now  already nearly bankrupt being  2.6 trillion in debt. As India said to Russia, now is not  the time for war, it is also not the time for political games and strikes. We "the people",   of ALL   cultures in the UK, have to unite to sacrifice a little and seek to end the uncontrollable and unsustainable immigration  in order  to save the nation we live in. This includes the BBC  who have become biased and partisan in  destroying  Britain, airing only   the one sided woke opinions which they prefer.   The UK islands are   limited for land space which is our only sustenance and safety,  whatever race we are. We need to do this  now,  as maybe in  10 years,  we will  not have a nation or land to call home, literally, certainly no functioning  welfare and health services. We cannot  rely on soundbites,  or the BBC opinion only,  they were once trustworthy, not now,  If we cherish  the nation we live in whereever we are , we can then cherish the world and all people in it. As we now have all the world IN the UK i.e. over 100 ethnicity and 300 languages spoken.  This could make us very successful if we go forward  united with new ideas,  not allowing cultures and religion to divide us, OR,  it will  break us absolutely and we will not rise again, nor will the immigrants  in it.  There will be no "rights" for  anyone if the UK  goes bankrupt, we will be as  the nations that  the immigrants/refugees come from. There will be no  Foreign Aid from any nation if seekers of asylum  and refugees think that multiple children in their new host nation is a freedom they can enjoy,  even though the taxpayer is feeding and housing them, not they themselves, as many say, the richer economies are not a "moneytree"  we all have to work hard and pay our way,  90% suffer lack and poverty at some time in life, hate what we do for work, get bullied or attacked for some reason, whether white of black skin, because we are ugly or too attractive, too clever or not clever enough, or just "odd".   It's life , and we cannot have special "equality" for some and not for others, everything in life is by talent and hard work, otherwise we will not appoint /reward the best to do the job,  but we will be  "dumbing down"  or regressing, whether we appoint to have more women, more transgender, more gay, more black, more ethnic groups,  society will nor progress that way. There are many talents and abilities and we all have them, not all talents have to be academic, singing, acting. It is just finding something we do and love and having contentment with that,  life seems unfair because some do  have more  talents than others, so some of us  may not "make it" whether we have talent not, but its up to us to keep trying with what we have and not play the victim and blame everyone else, or the Government. Everything we have in life is what man has created from what he has discovered, men over the centuries have been very cruel, we are becoming better, but "woke" is not better as it is stifling free speech and removing clever and talented people from being able to speak. Someone on the BBC Radio 4 said on air that JK Rowling  "was not  a  very nice person", and that maybe we should not buy her books, or see the films based on her books, so now some are printing her books without her name so they feel better reading them.  There are many of us concerned about woke and many other issues in life today and if   a transgender person can say the above freely, whose only achievement  might  be  to be a transgender person and speak on the BBC. Yet he/she does  not  want allow another  person to have a different   view on a controversial issues like this, neither does the BBC,  that is not equality of action or freedom of speech, or impartiality by the BBC.  If one reads  wikipedia  on JK Rowling one can see the difficult life she had  over her lifetime,  I do  not agree with her views on supporting the Labour Party or opposing Brexit,  but she has achieved much and is an inspiration to anyone going through difficulty to "keep on keeping on" as we never know how far we will get until the day we die, and that should be our focus in life, not bringing others down or curtailing their right to disagree. This include "Black Lives Matter " whose leaders are openly Marxist, openly  telling the "whites" to "get out of our way" (GB news). We should remember Stalin and Lenin in Russia had a policy of sending those with controversial opinions writers, speakers, philosophers, academics,polictical opponents  to workcamps  in  Siberia , millions died, even now an unnecessary war has been started by Russia.  Hitlers regime started  much the same way. This is why  the supporters of  "woke"  policies of  de platforming those they do not agree with, or causing them to lose their jobs  is seen  as sinister and a repeat performance of what has already been before, we know how it will end already. If we do not know even a little recent  history, we will not see the dangers or where it leads.   This is how Hitler workedm  and Russia, China,  North Korea Iran and some others work.
 

What is Woke? https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/09/woke-word-meaning-definition-progressive "The word woke loosely refers to a social media-fueled, left wing political ideology that emerged in the English-speaking world in the early 2010s. The term is derived from the state of being awake to or conscious of structural inequalities in society and being hyper-aware of one’s own role in those inequalities. Someone who is woke is constantly inspecting every institution in society, looking for the presence of racism, sexism, and other forms of pervasive prejudice". 


What is Marxism? "To define Marxism in simple terms, it's a political and economic theory where a society has no classes. Every person within the society works for a common good, and class struggle is theoretically gone. Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy named after Karl Marx. It examines the effect of capitalism on labor, productivity, and economic development and argues for a worker revolution to overturn capitalism in favor of communism".


What is Theocracy? "A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god. "his ambition is to lead a worldwide theocracy"


What is a Dictatorship? "A dictatorship is a type of government in which a single person—the dictator—or party has absolute power. This means that the ruler or party has complete control. The rights of the people are typically suppressed in a dictatorship, sometimes to a great degree".


What is Capitalism: "Capitalism is often thought of as an economic system in which private actors (persons)  own and control property in accord with their interests, and demand and supply freely set prices in markets in a way that can serve the best interests of society. The essential feature of capitalism is the motive to make a profit. What does it mean to be capitalist? Individual capitalists are typically wealthy people who have a large amount of capital (money or other financial assets) invested in business, and who benefit from the system of capitalism by making increased profits and thereby adding to their wealth. By assuming the autonomy (independance of thought, action, choice) of the individual, capitalism grants dignity to the poor. By affirming people's right to their own labor, regardless of their position on the economic ladder, capitalism offers the poor the means to improve their own well-being. As an economic system, one of the effects of capitalism is that it breeds competition between countries and perpetuates poverty among developing nations due to the individual interests of private corporations rather than the needs of their workers. inequality, market failure, damage to the environment, short-termism, excess materialism and boom and bust economic cycles".


What is Socialism: "Socialism is, broadly speaking, a political and economic system in which property and the means of production are owned in common, typically controlled by the state or government. Socialism is based on the idea that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society. A socialist country is a sovereign state in which everyone in society equally owns the factors of production. The four factors of production are labor, capital goods, natural resources and entrepreneurship.  Disadvantages of socialism include slow economic growth, less entrepreneurial opportunity and competition, and a potential lack of motivation by individuals due to lesser rewards".


"The verdict is in, and contrary to what socialists say, capitalism, with all its warts, is the preferred economic system to bring the masses out of poverty and to make them productive citizens in our country and in countries around the world. Remember this: Capitalism rewards merit, socialism rewards mediocrity." 


(The above are taken from the internet)


Whatever race/culture we are from there should  be a  Common Courtesy  Culture for us all in the Uk and the world, regardless of race, religion, skin colour, sexual orientation. However,  Black Lives Matter  (BLM) should be banned,  as  they are divisive and racist and are rehashing a dangerous already tested and  failed political Marxist/ Communist   philosophy. The have conflated it  with Marxism (mixed it up)  with racism and the Uk  has passed laws to stop racism,  but it is  oppressing   ordinary free speech as well i.e. asking someone "where are you from", or being deemed a racist just by being of white skin colour.   The English in particluar  are now  not allowed to think or speak,  as just by existing we are racist, i.e. unconscious bias and white fragility. Even though  England is our own nation and immigrants came of thero own free will, can return if they wish, they  all do have their own lands, some even have their own homes in these lands still, while also having obtained  Council property in the UK where many English cannot now obtain these.



THE COMMON COURTESY  CULTURE - WORLDWIDE.

Rights With Responsibility.

Play Your Positive Part In Life.

Please. Sorry. Thank you. Queue.

Smile. Live & Let Live. Forgive.

Be Polite, Even In Anger.

Agree to Disagree. Do Not Impose.

Submit to the Police.

Do Not Be Kind To Crime. 

Clever Or Not, Be Humble.

Be Grateful.

Every Life Matters.

WHAT UNITES?.

*To be Free 

*To be happy.

*To be well.

*To have food, water, shelter, companionship.

*To have peace of mind 

*To have peace in the world.

*To have power over our own lives.

*To have work we enjoy.

*To have a goal that motivates us.

*To have a family. To belong.

WHAT DIVIDES?

Religion divides Us.

Political beliefs divide us

Language divides us.

Laws divide us.

Education and Knowledge or lack of it divides us.

Money and lack of it divides us.

Culture divides us.

Skin colour divides us

Not being able to speak freely divides us.

Our "thinking" affected by of all the above, and  is the ultimate division.

WHAT HINDERS PROGRESS ? 

*Human Nature and Emotions

*Some want power over others 

Power for their own benefit, or for their group/race/culture

*Some do not care, as long as they are OK.

*Some tell lies, or manipulate to maintain power over others, 

 to stay in high office,  a job or position, or to retain influence.

* Not obeying the rules/laws, or bringing in their own laws to oppress.

To Falsely Use Race, Poverty, Mental Health, Disability As A Means To Oppress & Make Gains 

 Asylum  and Conflictive  Human Rights.

Toxic Significant Celebrities/Leaders using influence to destruct others nations/groups

WHAT PROMOTES PROGRESS?

*Critical thinking on every issue, i.e. looking impartially at both sides of an issue.

*Live and Let Live attitude.

*Not getting angry/rude if someone disagrees with you..

*Free speech that allows dissent and discussion without rancour.

*We do not have to be right, we can "agree to disagree" Obey the great and small laws that keep society in peace.

Do not steal, murder, leave litter or dog fouling, play loud music in

communal or public places like parks, streets, trains, tubes, or communal  gardens.

*We MUST have a RIGHT to ask "where are you from" and not be told it is racist to do so.

 It's a simple "getting to know you" inquiry in any society, a chance to hear about your culture,

(that you want others  to recognize and value), or just your life experience, to hear about its problems and benefits.

If you are of African,  European,  or any other heritage, to ask society to suppress this simple inquiry, is an oppression of the soul.


 CONFLICTING EXAMPLES OF HUMAN & EQUAL RIGHTS  WHICH   CREATE STALEMATE FOR PROGRESS.

Right to family Life:  Having more than  2 Children is a self imposed family & national poverty and  will destroy the planet.(Worldwide leaders  & individuals must take control of global warming and voluntarily have  2 or less children. Rich nations have 2 or less children, poor nations have 4 to 10 as the UK once did, when we were also poor)

Right to follow  a religion: Yet  Some  Holy Book's  (Qur'an) say a women can be "scourged"  at times.(We will never stop  terrorism/violence generally or against women if Human Rights Protect a Religion with such words) The Qur'an says its follow we should not "befriend Jews & Christians" which is racist/discriminatory.(We will never stop division or have racial integration with such words protected as a "truth" in a Holy Book).Cultures allowing Honour killing is murder. Female Genital Mutilation is child  physical abuse.(There should be no "equality" to be claimed for cultures practicing the above, they are ancient tribal  traditions based on a man made error of thought/belief/culture and should be taught as such in schools). Black Lives Matter is Racist  By Name and Seeks  Anarchy/Superiority/Government Control,  Not Equality.(Society will not progress with aims of defunding the Police, making hero's of criminals, burning the host nation flag, "raising the fist" against society, destroying  the history and the features of a host nation by  riot) Transgender Teaching In Schools: Children should not  be "taught" transgender, it is a minority group issue and some feel is a psychological/mental health/emotional  issue as many who apply for this life option already have other mental health issues, i.e  self harm, anorexia, bulimia, autism.  It is also It is destabilizing  ALL children,  who will then  think it is a choice they must/can make. Some  do and then regret it. Psychologically,  what child can deal with deciding if they are male and female before 18? Schooldays are full of bullies and it endangers children who may be  easily  led into this  alternative lifestyle, creating unnecessary new  mental health issues. One time "tomboy" girls will have pressure put on them "would you like to be a boy really do you think", they are likely to say "Yes" without  having any idea what they are agreeing to, this may lead to notes in their school  reports to counsel them on transgender and lead them into that lifestyle, children are very suggestible, as the quote goes "give e a child until 7 and I will show you the man/woman" i.e. what we learn in those first 7 years moulds us for better or worse for a lifetime. We can see from those who have committed serious crimes, that many have suffered great abuse or lack  love and attention, it is hard to judge them as responsible  sometimes when they have not experienced any norms of family life.     We would be better  teaching children about bullying and identifying this at primary school and counseling the bullies so they do not become adults that bully. Transgender issues should not introduced until  16 in schools. Research should be made on children living  in same sex marriages and those  who have chosen a  transgender   lifestyle. In the meantime there  should not be medical or surgical options offered before 18, in this, Russia may be correct in withholding gay interactions before 18, perhaps 16 should be the time to allow serious discussion.  We can be kind to minorities, but we should not be imposing minority choices onto the majority.  We should be protecting children from peer and social pressures to "try out" minority group lifestyles that could affect their lifetime development and mental/emotional  well being, sometimes leaving them in a state of "limbo" if they have life changing surgery/medication that cannot be reverses when they find they still feel at odds with themselves. It should be remembered that transgender  are those who "think/feel" they are of the different gender or even "multi gender",  we can automatically conclude  it is psychological  issue, the normal state of a human is male /female relationships in order to procreate. 


Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant 5or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.


Religion, Belief. Is There a God? 

Belief is a powerful force in our lives, belief in ourselves to achieve something, and belief in a God.   There are many religions and many deviations of each religion. Religions are often part of a nations identity and believed throughout that nation, which indicates that religions or "God" may well be a man made concept, as many  believe is the case i.e. Is lslam is mostly in the Middle East, Chrsitinity in Europe, India has multiple "God's". Israel is Jewish and is uniquely both their  national identity and religion, though many are secular Jews, i.e. they do not believe in God.  Religion has created many wars and divisions in society and nations, even now, where it has become detrimental to society once again, creating terrorism, wars and oppression.  Religion has  always been  toxic to society due to misunderstanding, the Bible & Qur'an in particular and when  individuals do not read  these books IN FULL themselves.  We should  not rely on preachers of any religion, they may not have read these books in full  themselves either, then we develop deviations of each religion and become more divided.


Multiculturalism and   Multi Religious society  Is now again creating division in society, not unity. We should have known this  already as Ireland has been divided  with violence by Catholic and Protestant  beliefs to the detriment of many. Northern Ireland  now tries to unite school children in mixed Catholic and Protestant  school classes  to try and gradually resolve the divided adult society and the future society they will inhabit as adults. Bizarrely and dangerously,  in  England,  we have now  established  Academy Faith  Schools (promoting a particular faith in each school). It is another example of returning to policies that  have  been done before and which did not work.  Ideally, we should have state schools (and private and Grammar schools) all with the same basic curriculum, or  perhaps the Academy's we now have  with specialty subjects  like Drama, Art or the sciences for instance, but religious studies should always be a subject taught as part of the core  curriculum covering ALL  religions, without promoting any  particular faith in any  school  i.e.  ALL  state,  private  and Grammar schools should remain secular. Religious practices should be taught at home by parents (as should cultural differences and history  like slavery), or within  their  religious community only i.e. the Church, Mosque, Synagogue, Temple etc.  The current Faith school Academy system in the UK (or England) is setting society up for a  great  division as the minds of children are being indoctrinated with ideas of God that may not be real


Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant 5or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.


1“Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God;a believe also in me. 2In my Father’s house are many rooms. If it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you?b 3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. 4And you know the way to where I am going.”c 5Thomas said to him, “Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?” 6Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you had known me, you would have known my Father also.d From now on you do know him and have seen him.”8Philip said to him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” 9Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. 11Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works (miracles) themselves. 12“Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I am going to the Father. 13Whatever you ask in my name, this I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14If you ask mee anything in my name, I will do it. 15“If you love me, you will keep my commandments. 16And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper,f to be with you forever, 17even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees him nor knows him. You know him, for he dwells with you and will beg in you.18“I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. 19Yet a little while and the world will see me no more, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. 20In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you. 21Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest (show clearly) myself to him.” 22Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, “Lord, how is it that you will manifest yourself to us, and not to the world?” 23Jesus answered him, “If anyone loves me, he will keep (retain, remember, believe) my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him. 24Whoever does not love me does not keep (retain, remember, believe) my words. And the word that you hear is not mine but the Father’s who sent me.25“These things I have spoken to you while I am still with you. 26But the Helper, the Holy Spirit (Gods own invisible Spirit) , whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you. 27Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid. 28You heard me say to you, ‘I am going away, and I will come to you.’ If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I. 29And now I have told you before it takes place, so that when it does take place you may believe. 30I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming. He has no claim on me, 31but I do as the Father has commanded me, so that the world may know that I love the Father. Rise, let us go from here. 


It would seem that Spirit and words are interchangeable and we humans  are the image (likeness) of God and Jesus Christ by having a spirit in us, which is the ability to think and speak.  My words are  MY  human spirit which go forth as I   speak  with any person, and people  might remember my words  and are affected for  good or ill by my words. My spirit lives with them as  they remember my words, and as I remember their words  and their spirit lives with me.  With God's words in the New Testament spoken by Jesus Christ, these  words are God's Spirit entering into us and staying with us if we believe them and hope/believe they are  true. These Words also carry  the creative   power of God as do the Words of Jesus Christ, but only when we believe them, as even Jesus Christ did not do miracles when  people did not believe he was the Messiah (anointed one) or Son of God. Elsewhere in the New Testament Jesus says God's will is that we live again after death and the words of Jesus are the "way" to obtain  this life.   Its the words that we believe that leads to life,  and ONLY  those words in the New Testament that Jesus spoke. The Quran does not have anything like these words and narrative of the gospel.  It would seem that neither the Quran, nor any other religion  will  lead anyone to eternal life, simply because this is where the full story, the "words" are  for everlasting life.  These "words"  say they will be proved to us, and proof of God,  as we live our lives believing it,  as miracles or other more subtle things occur. 


And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which see's the Son, and believes on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.  John 6:40


But then again, others believing other Gods or stories about God say  that  miracles happen with them, so what can  we say IS true? It matters whether  we   believe or  not, it    is the  one of the  key reasons the world  is so  divided and also  so brainwashed we fear  not believing or challenging our belief, in case God is angry  and  then end up believing things that are dogma,  i.e. which noone is allowed to query or say is wrong.  Yet those nations  who do not believe in God, such as Communism, created the mass murderers Stalin and Lenin and the Gulag prisons in Siberia just because one challenged/queried  the  communist system. So do not think that abolishing the notion of God will make a better world, history has shown it will be as bad,  or far worse.  Even Christianity has brought child abuse, cruelty and The Spanish Inquisition, while Islam brings terrorism,  ISIS.  oppression of women.



IS THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION TRUE? MAKING ALL OTHERS UNTRUE OR INCOMPLETE?

We need take seriously belief and faith of the 3 main religions  as they cause great discord and suffering in the world and as individuals if we get brainwashed without knowing thoroughly   ourselves the books.  I speak of Jews, Christians. Muslims.


Religion  and Human Rights are a key cause of conflict in the world in the past and now,

 these must be discussed and resolved for society to progress.


 Please see:  www.TurningTheTideOfTerrorism.com  / www.ACertainMyth.com (or is it true).


SUGGESTED GLOBAL & UK POLICIES   


Key Policy 1: Safely Change Parliamentary Politics in the UK and Worldwide by more “Independents” standing For Election.   Coalition Government Systems, or Proportional Representation do not work well. Little agreement is reached and Governments then fail as too many elections are then called creating instability. The Uk 2 party System of "first past the post" of (usually) Labour and Conservatives,  also does not work well, as Labour creates Policies to spend Taxpayers money on the population to win their votes and gain power. These policies are usually not financially sensible/feasible and then the Taxpayer funds run out. The Conservatives win back power again (as in 2010) as the nation is in dire financial problems, and they have to sort the finances out again before the nation goes bankrupt. We currently swing from “left to right” Politics and each cancels out the others policies and we make slow, or no progress. If we have more "Independents" standing with their own Policies and/or adopting some or all of the Policies of the current Political Parties that they adhere to, they then stand as  “Independent Labour”, “Independent Conservative” "Independent Green” "Independent Reclaim", etc. But "Independents" will not be part of any “whip”, as they will not need to go through the "vetting" process of a relevant Party if they are "Independent". Usually if any of us are selected by a Party to stand for them in an area, we are  then obliged to vote according to the Party requirements, which is often against our conscience or "better judgement". There will also be "Independents “ who do not want to identify with any Party and want their own policies but with a mix of the various other Party  Policies if they choose. Finally there will also be the "British International Independent Party" "Independents" (BIIP), taking on some, or all of these Policies on this website, and any others they wish to support of other Parties, and/or their own unique policies.   This way all "Independents" choose Policies that they believe will  take Britain  and the world  forward , focusing not on the good for their party and what will get them elected, or for the good of THEIR culture, religion or race  at the expense of the  "common good"  of the Britain and the World. Then a full range of ideas will be put forward for the future of the  UK  and the world,  that those elected are free to support or not.   Even democracy is "only as good as those elected" or even those voting, we all "think" and judge differently because of our age, experience, culture, religion, education, parental and societies input.   If the above system is successful, we could gradually have many “Independents” elected, then there will come a point when the following could apply:  When an election is over,  the new MPs elect the Prime Minister (PM) out of all those newly elected MPs. The PM then elects his “Cabinet” out of all of those new MPs elected. Currently the winning Party elects the cabinet only from their own party. However,  MPs and the public do not always agree fully with any one Party and its Policies, and we limit freedom of political thought and action and do not chose what is best necessarily.   We do not need the Government to set up this system, we can just begin by standing as “Independents” along the above lines and it will develop naturally. If this is what the public want, they will start electing "Independents" until most, or all MPs are Independents. In  conjunction with this policy we must also bring in Key Policy 3 and 4 to ensure the public can vote with some knowledge This way we may leave behind left/right policies and Political Parties that make themselves “different”, only with damaging opposing policies, just for the sake of getting into power. If it works in the UK. other nations might follow, even the authoritarian regimes.  The UK and the world needs to move forward quickly with good and sensible ideas, to include addressing the Global Warming problem. These ideas should not be hard to identify if we remove partisan motives, i.e. based only culture, class, woke or other preferences. We need to look at the resources, weaknesses and strengths of our own nation, and the problems and strengths of other nations. This to include Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Africa, South America, in order to create a NEW more inclusive prosperity and security worldwide. If we do not do this, it will be too late to regain control of Global Warming and potential  worldwide national bankruptcy and failed nation status of even the successful nations. The UK and Europe and some other nations cannot sustain immigration of all the poor and war torn of the world, particularly if those that arrive as immigrants, refugees or Asylum seekers, still maintain large families they cannot afford but expect the Governments (the Taxpayer) to support. Even the rich "West" will not be able to sustain this.  The "poor" also have to be "responsible" and only have children they can afford, i..e no more than two. There  is an  obvious but perhaps undocumented  direct correlation between family size and poverty in the family, which flows into  poverty for  the nation.

Key Policy 2: Maximum 2 Children Per Woman

Africa is expected to double its population by 2050, the UK and EU population growth is only 3%. Africa is very poor, the UK and some of the EU has good health care and welfare systems and a good standard of living for most. There are poor in the UK, but this is mostly due to having large families or children born without the Father present. Sometimes several children are born to different Fathers, yet still there is no Father to support the Mother of these children. The Father also do not pay child support, then it is expected that the Government (the Taxpayer) pays. There must be responsibility of ALL from age 16 onwards to ensure a child is not born before age 25 ideally (we are usually not financially or emotionally secure enough before then) and there is an intent  to remain with the Father of the child until the child or children is at least 12 years old. There is a direct correlation between family size and poverty in the family and then the nation. Worldwide we must ALL aim for  maximum of 2 children or less, or none.  Bangladesh has had success with this goal. The UK and other modern nations has access to birth control, and there must be assistance to other nations for this provision, with education on its benefits.  The Western nations are renowned for generally only having 1 or 2 children per family/woman. It is obvious that there is a direct link that large families bring poverty to themselves, and then to their nation. There is great danger therefore in the mass immigration we are now experiencing in the UK and many of the richer nations. Made worse because immigrants still follow their own culture or religious preferences, by having large families, regularly 4 to 10 children, even when they cannot afford them. Britain, Europe and other nations will also become failed nations if family size is not addressed in ALL cultures and nations, including the English. Dealing with this is key to resolving Global Warming issues as well as family and national poverty. Marcus Rashford (whose Mother was a single parent with 5 children, his Mother West Indian), petitioned for food and facilities for the children of the poor, to be provided during school holiday’s as well as term time. I think the Taxpayer also provides breakfasts. This is an unprecedented unsustainable demand on the Taxpayer, for it is our own hardworking money we are spending. Only the rich can afford more than 2 children, and as we never know what will happen in life and we need to do reduce global population to reduce Global Warming. Marcos Rashford and others who promote free school meals to the poor, should also publicly  promote 2 children or less for every family, for the sake for these children and their successful future. The Government and schools should also promote this. Parents must realize that it is their responsibility to  feed and care for  their children without relying on the Taxpayer to feed them and  give  the children the attention they deserve. If we do not do this, the Taxpayer i.e the Government, will go bankrupt and the UK will be as poor as Africa. Africa does not have free education, healthcare, welfare and homes, even water, soon the UK  also may be this way. The water board in 2020 warned us that  the UK may have water shortage in 25years i.e. 2040/45.  Mass immigration is changing the nations thinking for the worse, we all think  Welfare, Healthcare,  Housing are unlimited, it is not, this is why we now have long NHS queues, no dentists taking new patients, not enough homes, fewer school places near where we live.  All the world cannot flood to the richer nations and expect to live as they did before,  because of the way richer nations live, is the reason they are successful, not because of slavery 200 years ago. The reason why poor nations are poor is because of the way they live now, not because or Slavery 200 years ago. 

 

Key Policy 3:  Baseline Politics and Economics Education.   Key to Policy 1 working, is an educational website on basic politics for the public on the government website, and to be compulsorily promoted by the BBC and other media outlets. An example shown below:

Baseline Political and Government Financial Education at School And On-Line For Adults to inform us of the basic general political aims or ethos of each Political Party, also that they often do not meet their stated aims, but the opposite happens.  Plus the past 50 years accomplishments and errors of the Political Parties and how the breakdown of Tax Spending is in the UK. To simply explain that it is the Taxpayer (not the Government), the ones who work hard, and ALSO  the rich, who also work hard (often harder than most), that pay much of the cost for ALL of those on Benefit, Education, health care (NHS), the Police and Council services. These  public services do not generate wealth, they drain it, which is why when  Unions demand massive pay rises, it is the Taxpayer paying.  Wealth for the nation, is provided by the taxes we pay. The Entrepreneurs, Trade and Business and those with unusual talent and financial success create wealth, new jobs, and the money we pay our taxes from that which  then pays nurses etc. We all have free access to these Health & Welfare services even if we pay little or no Tax into the system. These services help those in particular who cannot create sufficient wealth for themselves to pay for these things, or even to live adequately. But it is  not for any “poor” person  to  then have children they cannot afford, or not attempt work if they are able, or spend money on drugs, alcohol, excess or unhealthy food and then demand more from the “Government”, i.e. the Taxpayer. The Health & Welfare and Housing is to protect us in difficult times. People vilify the “rich” but it is the wealthiest 10% that pay for 80% of all these Health & Welfare costs for the majority of us. So we “poor” who may be relying on Rent or Housing Benefit, Council homes, Tax credits, Universal Credit, free school meals, health care, only receive this because of the clever and richer individuals who generate the trade and wealth of the nation.  It is not a "right" that we have ANY children if we cannot afford them, we currently have 89'000 children in Council care. We should not be vilifying the rich, nor demanding endless pay rises, without this in mind. By the same token, the rich should have the attitude of gratitude that it is only by chance they are born with  great ability and a stable home perhaps, coupled of course, with their hard work and making the best of their abilities and dedication. The “poor” and "rich" (of the English and all cultures), should also have an attitude of gratitude that we are in the UK, where we are usually  not left to starve, we have a Police force and crime is not “rife” (yet, but Black Lives Matter want the Police defunded), or we can go to hospital or doctor free of charge. It for us to all take responsibility to live within our means, not spend spare cash  on costly mobile phones, Alcohol, Drugs, Holidays, and not have more than 2 children, and less if possible, and not before age 25 ideally. This is for our own sake, and that of our children, nation and the survival of the planet earth.

Key  Policy 4:    “Baseline Education Degree By DVD for UK & Worldwide”. Compulsory for children from age 11 at school. This part of the Policy should be introduced in the last term of primary school, perhaps all day viewing within 4 weeks and with short  voluntary  discussion, and again at age 13 and then repeated at 16 perhaps  for those teenagers  that are not progressing academically, those excluded, or adults  in prison.   They could watch these DVDs or films on You Tube so that even the non academic, or not now in school,  have  a "Baseline" knowledge of the world and its major events and accomplishments.    These should also be promoted worldwide and  accessed free (the books will have to be purchased) so that worldwide we all have a similar "Baseline" Knowledge of Life and the World on which to build. We learn best by having a  basic "baseline" and then we add to it as live day to day, or with  additional study. Certain basic Knowledge gives us mental/emotional stability, and takes away inferiority, it allows those who cannot read or write to "know" basic issues and via DVDS or by  You Tube, they  can be watched numerous times in life. It will take away  a "little" of the mystery between those that are academic and those that are not, and begin to remove that "divide". Just a little. Suggestions to start this off until  specific briefer ones can be made maybe:

1) History of the World by Andrew Marr

2) The Wonders Collection with Prof. Brian Cox (Wonders of the Solar System)

3) The Story of Science Presented by Michael Mosely

4) Darwins Dangerous Idea presented by Andrew Marr

5) The Richard Dawkins Collection Presented by Richard Dawkins

6) A History of Christianity presented by Diarmaid MacCulloch

7) Jerusalem The Making of a Holy City Presented by Simon Sebag Montefiore.

8) World at War Series  Narrated by Laurence Olivier

9) Life of Mohamed Presented by Rageh Omaar. 

10) BOOK: Usbourne Politics For Beginners By Alex Frith/Rosie Hore

11) BOOK: Religion in Minutes By Marcus Weeks

12)The Worldly Philosophers  by Robert HeilBroner

13) Big Ideas in Brief by Ian Croften

14) (Self help book title to follow)

15) (DVD Title To Follow on Slavery: Ancient to Current Day)

16) (DVD Title To Follow on Empires of the World from Ancient times to Modern Day)

17) ( DVD  Title  To Follow on  A Brief History of Every Nation)

18)  (DVD Title To follow on Basic Politics and Economics so that the public can vote with same  basic knowledge at least)


Key Policy 5: Police Lives Matter V Black Lives Matter;     New Guidelines/Law : How To Respond  To The Police & Assist Them, And Be Safe.

1)  Do not run

2)  Do what they ask

3)  Do not be rude

4) Answer questions politely

5) Remember they do not know if you have a gun, a knife, or are  a terrorist, for appearances are deceptive.

6)  If you are stopped by Police and are obstructive, rude or run, YOU are the one at fault and may be charged.

7) Police stop/investigate people of all cultures because all cultures commit crime. It is not racism.

8) Their job is to protect us and they risk their lives daily, help them to help you, and the rest of society.   

9) Do your part, report anything suspicious and be a witness if asked.

10) Police are there to support the law abiding, not the criminals,  do not behave like one and run.

11)  Do not support any sort of criminal activity, report it

12) To riot to support a criminal who has been shot or died resisting the Police is supporting crime, that  itself is a crime.

13) Do not be kind to crime, help prevent it.

 14) Help the Police to help you.

Many of those currently shot by Police in the USA or UK have been criminals, including Floyd/Blake/Duggan for whom  violent masses have rioted and caused damage. Floyd once took a gun to a pregnant women's stomach, are these the people we want to protect? They care not for the law abiding citizen, maybe those that riot are not law abiding (many wear masks when rioting) is  this why they demand defunding of the Police?  Many others have been carrying guns, on drugs, aggressively resisting Police (this includes those with mental health who also kill others), or running from the  Police.  Soon we will not have police willing protect the law abiding public and crime and corruption will be rife.   If Police go out to work each day and they are faced with the choice of either being shot themselves, or shooting too soon and then facing a murder charge, understandably there will be none with integrity  willing to be a Policeman.  There are many in society  that think those involved in crime should not take responsiblity for their actions, even a breach of traffic law is a crime, dumping rubbish is a crime,  noise and nuisance is a crime.  Many do not know what it means to obey the law and that to run with a gun or knife and then throw it down at the last minute IS obeying the law, or that running from the Police, ignoring them,  or refusing  a request from them is acceptable. It is not.

Key Policy 6.   New Leadership Goals For All Youth In Schools & For Schools/Prisons/Promoting Of The Duke Of Edinburgh's Award For Those In Particular That  Are Without Guidance At Home .    The Award is was somewhat based on  Six Declines of Modern Youth By Kurt Hahn (Founder of Gordorstoun School that the Duke of Edinburgh Attended).  During his lifetime, Hahn summarized his beliefs about the younger generation at the time into six points, of which are collectively known as the Six Declines of Modern Youth:

  1. Decline of Fitness due to modern methods of locomotion;
  2. Decline of Initiative and Enterprise due to the widespread disease of spectatoritis (i.e. "excessive indulgence in forms of amusement in which one is a passive spectator rather than an active participant");[14]
  3. Decline of Memory and Imagination due to the confused restlessness of modern life;
  4. Decline of Skill and Care due to the weakened tradition of craftsmanship;
  5. Decline of Self-discipline due to the ever-present availability of stimulants and tranquilisers;
  6. Decline of Compassion due to the unseemly haste with which modern life is conducted or, as William Temple  called it, "spiritual death".

Hahn also proposed four solutions to these problems:

  1. Fitness Training (e.g., to compete with oneself in physical fitness; in so doing, train the discipline and determination of the mind through the body);
  2. Expeditions (e.g., via sea or land, to engage in long, challenging endurance tasks);
  3. Projects (e.g., involving crafts and manual skills);
  4. Rescue Service (e.g., surf lifesaving, fire fighting, first aid).

"There Is More In You than You Know" 

(Duke  Of Edinbugh)


 Key Policy 7   Strikes To Be Made Illegal,  They  Have Become A Legalised Blackmail By A Minority To Harm the Majority, Even the NHS  Doctors Have Risked Lives In Strikes, now (2022) Nurses, doctors, lawyers, railways, post office workers, dockmen are all onstrikes or  threatening strikes. This after Covid and now a Energy crisis due the war in Ukraine. Strikes are also a means to create revolution and destabilise the Government. Inflated wages create inflation and a vicious circle results. If  we  want revolution, it usually ends badly and the bullies  and Marxists get into power which lead to bankruptcy and dictatorship.   Instead we should set up an improved ACAS  with public jury type system for major disputes. So a dispute is registered and then 6 or 12  Jury of the public called.  Then a  Union Rep, workers specialist for both sides to provide evidence, Parliament Representative to provide long term costs of a pay rise and economic situation.  The Jury should be from the public with an equal mix of male/female and over 40 years of age. The alternative to this that Strikes are made  illegal in the public services at least that the Taxpayer pays,  and  a wage  review of public services every year is made, and this is binding as it is the taxpayer paying. Private companies can hire and fire as they like if anyone goes on strike, the mass redundcy of the  P & O case should not be vilified if the business was near bankruptcy.  A company can only exist if it is making money, and even now many Unions have unreasonable  "rules" the companies or public service institutions cannot do to their staff.

 

Key Policy 8:     We should establish  a "School for Leaders" or a "Course for Leaders" starting at 16 on to "A" and degree level based on some of the ethics of Harrow, Eton distinguished Schools.   It should be available throughout the Uk and to other nations by internet, and/or by setting up such schools/colleges in Africa and other nations, such as Venezuela, as agreed by those nations. To include how international trade works,  and how to set up a small business with a tax system to allow new business to flourish. For instance in some EU nations, a new business must have about £50'000 before a start up is allowed, and from the outset, they are taxed monthly a high amount, so this is before any trading is done and profits made. Very few can start a business in this environment. It is new business that eventually creates larger business, and the jobs, and the tax income that pays the services for each nation, the Health and welfare and free education. This also may be why some nations do not flourish. In the UK it is very  easy to set up a business and to sometimes to get Bank Loans if a  good proposal is put forward to the bank. Obviously honesty is paramount, as corruption can interfere how such programme's work.

Key Policy 9:    International Central Fund Set Up And Distributed to individuals on a “dollar a day” via Mobile Phones. If successful,  to perhaps eventually include 75% or more of the Foreign Aid Budget currently paid  to Foreign Governments,  so that we gradually spread the wealth of the world to nations in poverty directly to the public and avoid the loss of money from corruption when paid through Governments.   This should be  coupled with repatriation scheme for those wanting to assist  their  original nation of origin to help it redevelop.  This might mitigate  the  mass unsustainable and  dangerous immigration to the West and Europe in particular.  The West   cannot sustain this influx of immigration without eventually failing themselves to the extent that even Foreign Aid will not be available to the poorer nations. Instead we can gradually  improve opportunity and development in ALL nations. We should  offer scholarships or resettlement schemes to those who wish to return to their own cultural nation, and if on welfare benefit in the UK,  this could still be paid to them perhaps when repatriated so they can access  homes at a cheaper rate and improved standard of living, as the welfare payments will buy more in these nations,  as well as helping the economy and employment of  that nation. It will also provide opportunity in these nations  by taking this income and  their talent and experience to their own  nation.  We could also  introduce some system of small Financial Teams (not individuals)  to be taught in  the UK, EU, Australia, Canada   (using the Foreign Aid budget sent to those nations)  and then these teams  sent out to assist in the developing  the  economies and  to  assist democracy and trade.  If it is their own people, or people of their own heritage,  arriving to assist it,  will perhaps not be seen as  interference that “white” nations are currently accused of. The Economist John Maynard Keynes saw ahead for us in his lifetime (1883 -1944) was “barring such catastrophes as uncontrollable flood of population or a totally destructive war, was not a continuation of the current state of misery and doubt, but a prospect so fair as to be almost unbelievable, nothing less than Adam Smiths heralded land of universal plenty   (The Worldly Philosophers by Robert Heilbroner Page 288). We will all return to “misery and doubt” as the welfare system, education and law system fails due to the legal and illegal mass immigration into the UK and the EU,  and if large families start becoming the norm. The West is renowned for 3 children or less families, it is the mainstay of the success of any nation. With 2 children, each has attention from an adult, none are left out of having to care of siblings, each child is more likely to get enough food, clothes, education. It is easier to support 2 children financially to have fun and enjoy them, than to have 3 or more, where one at least will be left out. China should be commended for their success on their 1 child policy which has transformed their nation from poverty and their educational rating higher than most cultures. Their policy was compulsory, which brought in bad practices and societies want boys rather so there is now a shortage of females.  So such a policy needs to be voluntary and to cherish girls as much a boys to inherit, as the balance of society is interrupted.  

Key Policy 10:  Ban Faith Schools Which Divide Children  And They Grow Into Divided Society: Ireland Is Trying To Mix Schools to “Ease the Troubles” In Their Society. Have We Learnt Nothing?  Seek To Have A Standard Secular Education System. We want prosperity for all peoples, but we all have to abide by the same rules and aims and committed to the nation we live in,  not the one we come from.    The idea of establishing the was to abolish nationalism, i.e. the pride and competition and disputes between nations that brought the World Wars and other wars. I assume their aim with the Maastricht Treaty was to make all nations “mix” within all nations, so that we banish yet futher  that “national” separation and  we become more peaceful and prosperous worldwide. It has worked to an extent perhaps, we have had less wars in Western Europe at least, but this may have been because the whole world was exhausted with war and we had the Nuclear bomb as well, which meant human extinction if another war occurred. The downside is that the prosperous nations now  have too much immigration, and multiculturism allows every citizen to promote and preserve their own nationality in the host nation they move to, including their language, their laws, their religion.  Faith schools has made this worse, for now we now have ghetto type areas of certain cultures, mini foreign  nations in certain cities. We have also had riots in the past along cultural lines in the UK.  I do not think the English can  be accused of racism when have been so accommodating that we are becoming a minority in our own land. In some cities, London, Birmingham, Slough, we are  already a minority, with schoolchildren of ethnic minorities creating the extra pressure on schools and are 71% of the increase in school numbers. That means only 30% of the birth rate is of English parents, which means in a few generations England will not be English. The male  English  youth are  academically also the worst performing in schools. Why is that? The singer Stormzy set up  a fund to help BME (black minority ethnic) groups to achieve better in schools, but when someone offered  funds  for the poor performing working class English, this was not allowed as it was not “equal” opportunity  and access for all.  So we are increasingly having double standards that are  always trying to raise the opportunity of minority ethnic groups, which is good, but not when racist and other laws are usurping any control or protection of the English in their own land. We should not be hindering anyone to progress, certainly not the English in their own land.   2015 : Pupils from ethnic minorities made up 71 per cent of the increase in primary school numbers. Almost one in three of England’s primary school children is from an ethnic minority — the highest level yet, figures show. One pupil in five speaks English as a second language,   the survey by the Department for Education  revealed. The growth in the number migrants, combined with a baby boom, is putting unprecedented pressure on schools. A growing number of primary schools have become supersized as they struggle to cope with the increase in population. In only one year there has been a 2.1 per cent increase in the number of pupils at state primary schools in England. This equates to almost 94,000 more children. Ethnic minority pupils made up 71 per cent of the increase. (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/one-third-of-englands-young-pupils-are-from-ethnic-minorities-jgt28h39qff).

Key Policy 11  With  immediate affect the BBC must      1)Have a Warning/Information on all its screens and read out over the radio before every news bulletin: As follows:   "The BBC is compelled by law  to provide unbiased  news  and programmes if they carry facts and issues in discussion, or disputed opinions. Listeners should be aware that critical thinking on every issue must be used by the listener to ensure that they themselves investigate the opposing view of any issue in order that society moves forward and does not repeat the errors of the past."      2)   With immediate affect as the  BBC does not promote the opposing views yet and has become dangerously partisan with some key issues,   the BBC should commission The New Culture Forum Channel, to show all those  programmes's currently made by them and to be streaming indefinitely. The BBC must also commission them on certain topics to show the opposing viewpoint not being presented by BBC own staff. 3) The BBC is over represented by ethnic minority groups, or minority groups such as LGBTQ.  Diversity is good but not if there are no English present at all and no English majority opinions allowed to challenge minority group opinion of Black Lives Matter, LGBTQ, women's rights, activist rights. If we are to have "black staff" employed because they are black, then 70% of staff should be English as the population is 70% English. The BBC covers the whole land not just London, which is now only 36% English.  An outside overseer should ensure that staff percentages are balanced,  my local co op for instance is all ethnic minorities. This should apply across the board for all industry, Police, Board Rooms, Military etc.  However, ideally it should be by talent and experience only after the 70% white and the 30% ethnic minority be they white or black.   We do not get a job because if  are not good enough, or do  not  have enough experience. It is easy for anyone to lay the "victim" saying they did not  get a position because they were of ethic group or colour,  those who are good,  with talent, presentable, can speak English  clearly, do not have a negative  "agenda" against the UK, will get a job.  I did not get many jobs I wanted.  That's life, not race. If the England is  70% English  we have a "right" to have 70% of the jobs if we are giving out jobs by quotas.

 

Key Policy 12:    1) Investigate The London Mayor Sadiq Khan for Abuse/Misuse of Public Office and Funds and/or Breach of Trust:    As Follows: Potential Evidence:

 Sadiq Khan the London Mayor has been partisan with regard to Black Lives Matter in not acting in the best interest and safety  of all London residents, and not even for Black residents,  as they too were not advised  by the London  Mayor according to Government and Police ruling to stay at home prior to a Black Lives Matter  Protest, risking  Covid infection to  their own lives as well as others.  On  5th or 6th June on the Radio 4 Today Programme just before the BLM Protests on the 6th June 2020, when asked what he would advise the Protestors that day/weekend, he said twice "I am not attending the Protest as my Mother is self isolating and I do not want to compromise her,  but I  would not STOP  BLM supporters from Protesting" .  He said this twice as the Radio 4 Presenter pushed him on it. https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/mayor-of-london-statement-on-blm  Mayor of London statement on Black Lives Matter protest  06 June 2020  The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: “To the thousands of Londoners who protested peacefully today (it was not peaceful): I stand with you and I share your anger and your pain. George Floyd’s brutal killing must be a catalyst for change worldwide. No country, city, police service or institution can absolve itself of the responsibility to do better. We must stand together and root out racism wherever it is found. Black Lives Matter. “To the tiny minority who were violent and threw glass bottles and lit flares - you endangered a safe and peaceful protest (it was not peaceful and the EDF came out to stop the defacing of even the Cenetaph) and let down this important cause.”   Sadiq Khan while holding the office of London Mayor  clearly encouraged a  Protest  and gathering of people in breach of the Lockdown laws. As he is not of “white” origin he was compromised in his position being openly partisan to the Protest and misusing his Public Office for the benefit of his preferred racial "group{s)". He did not act in the best interest for all London residents to avoid the spread of a deadly infection during the first Pandemic in a 100 years and before we had any vaccine or real control over the issue. It was the height of irresponsibility and personal bias which leads to corruption and he should be removed from Public office and banned from any  Public Office again,  vocally and  vociferously  stirring up racial divide from a Public Platform.

2) This has also  led to  second account of  Misuse of Public Office and Public Funds   by Sadiq Khan  the London Mayor as he  has in 2020 appointed a new  diversity committee of 15 people paid by Taxpayers. There  are 4 English and 11 are of the Black communities. The statues and road names are part of UK/ Britain whose history it is, It  does not belong to just Londoners and certainly not to immigrants of 50 years residence. It is not for a violent BLM Protest Group and a biased London  Mayor  to make these changes.  Does a summer of Protest in support of the death of criminal  give them  the right to change centuries of history (and its school curriculum), in a nation that they despise and wish to take over by a raised fist, burning the Union Jack and chasing our Police?   This is anarchy. They say that the "Victorian" feel is not appropriate for modern London. This diversity goup are appointed to change Road names, erect and maybe take down (though they say not) statues/art. Will they put up a statue for Floyd who was a criminal resisting Police and once took a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach, or that of the temporary statue of the woman who helped tear down the Bristol statue with raised fist, so that the black children in this nation are inspired to do the same?   It cannot be that 15 persons of which the English are not the majority, have power to make such significant changes. Yet even 15 is not enough to make such decisions, it should be the whole nation (of England at least), to decide what is removed from our  London Capital  (and its school curriculum), not 2'200 Petition signatures and a biased partisan Mayor and HIS  chosen biased  appointees. The salaries may well be £50'000 to £100’000 annually  each member,  then the costs of removing, erecting statues and artwork, changing road names, changing the curriculum.  The cost of this unnecessary and  very inappropriate when we are putting up National Insurance  to workers  to cover  the cost of the Pandemic and people are losing jobs and business.

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/statues-of-slavers-around-london-could-be-pulled-down-under-mayor-s-new-diversity-plan

https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/arts-and-culture/commission-diversity-public-realm/diversity-public-realm-commission-members   

"Statues of slavers around London could be pulled down under mayor’s new diversity plan. Sadiq Khan wants to review and improve "the diversity of public landmarks" after protestors toppled the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, will launch a new commission to review and improve “the diversity of London’s public landmarks” after Black Lives Matter protestors tore down a statue of slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol. Statues in the capital linked to slavery could be removed under the new initiative. “There are some slavers that should come down, and the commission "will advise on that,” Khan told the BBC. A petition calling for the removal of a statue of the 18th-century slave trader Robert Milligan by Richard Westmacott located at West India Quay in east London has garnered more than 2,200 signatures".

3) It should be considered that   Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus the Director General    of the World Health Organistation should also be removed from office  as he also issued a statement from his worldwide platform that the Black Lives Matter Movement was an important issue  and should be allowed to continue despite the Pandemic and risks to black lives and every life.  If both the London Mayor and The W.H.O. Director General had fulfilled there unbiased service to ALL  humanity, they would have stopped the breach of Lockdown rules from the outset. Instead they made a special case of their  "own" compatriots  showing themselves corruptible and unworthy of the power and influence invested in them by vote or appointment.

 

KEY POLICY 13:    National Trust Properties, The Churchill Memorial  Trust and many others  are already changing Trust  names, removing artifacts,  removing articles written by Churchill on his website and changing memorial aims.    This is all based on the Black Lives Matter movement who  breached all  social rules  and lockdown during a worldwide  crisis, with rioting and looting on behalf of criminals and demanding  the defunding of Police, that they and the criminals who died did  not submit to but  ran from.  Floyd was a man imprisoned for burglary and using a gun with intent on a pregnant wombs stomach.  Yet the BBC, Intellectuals and Academics want us to change the British way of life, history, Law and Order, on the basis of criminals shot while running from or not submitting to the Law and Order of the nation and the Police who risk their lives for the public.   If the figures were collated properly we would see there is no bias just that the black races think differently to the white race. We are brought up differently and they are in  a nation they consider not  there own, and are trying  to live their way in another nation. It is not their fault of the child born here to immigrants., but it is a price they have to pay. They can return to their own nation, but a host nation cannot be expected to reduce itself to level being demanded in order to prove it is not racist or  that an immigrant is fully at one with themselves in the host nation. If I am white in a white  English nation, this is my culture and land, legal  immigrants  can live side by side with us  on an equal basis but it is  not an immigranst  right to set up groups to undermine our flag, history, education, law and order.  Thet  can only do that if they take the UK over and make it their own nation abolishing the English, Welsh, Irish, Scottish. Yet immigrants already  fight  between themselves (Hindu and Muslims riots Leicester 2022)  and  in various racial disputes or gang warfare and religious groups, a Muslim believer from London travelled up Scotland following his you tube video, and killed him for his slightky different faith. similar but more extreme disputes occur in Syria, Ireland, Lebanon, Africa, so we  already know the end result of competing cltures and faiths.  Therefore , Black Lives Matter is regressive not progressive and should be banned, as should Meghan Markle and Harry who tell untruths but calling it their truth and seek to undermine the UK  institutional system by false racial accusations. No one  knows the real Truth, they say, except themselves, so they make it up as they go along, as they bear witness to each others storyline, be it  a lie or truth. Meanwhile  they and the Media, and people such as Oprah Winfrey  make their money these stories, and only due to Harry's opprotunistic misuse of Royal Links and breaching Royal rules, i.e.no political activism and no monetising of  Royal status is allowed by Royal Members.   The very name Black Lives Matter is racist. We recently had  (2021)  ethnic children in the Pimilico College  London saying during a riot/strike at the school,  that the Union Jack was racist and was nothing to do with her. That flag represents the education she receives free, the health care and maybe the welfare payments she or her parents receive free, the peace and freedom we have in the UK that she and every other immigrant  enjoys.   There must be a halt and reversal of all these changes with immediate affect as the demands are based on  anarchy, discord and regressive policies and will bring civil war here no one will win, least of all those fair minded hard working  black and white immigrants who want to contribute to British society and progress of the world. and who are also being intimidated by Black Lives Matter supporters.

KEY POLICY  14:  Housing Policy UK: We do not need to build more homes necessarily, we just need to stop a small number of people owning more than one home in the first time buyer range and Council & Housing Trust homes.

It was reported in 2018  that 2 million private landlords owned 5 million homes on "buy to let". https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jun/25/home-ownership-out-of-reach-for-2-million-uk-families-says-thinktank. The main  reason why we have a shortage or homes to buy (which increases the demand to rent), is that too many people own more than their "fair share" of "first time buyer" price range of homes. Worse than this, rich foreign investors are buying them en masse from "Buy to let" landlords We need a law preventing this and that all "buy to let" are sold individually when put on the market, and perhaps only sold to UK passport holders. I have known visa holders with their visa due to expire in 6 months to purchase a first time buyer property. A "fair share" is one property per couple/person, instead,  now a few clever individuals have 2 to 100 first time buyer range homes, or more,  a person in Kent where I come from bought 1000 "buy to let" homes which he then sold en masse to 2 overseas investors. That is a 1000 young couples without a home to buy. Buy to let has been curtailed a little, but it needs to be stopped completely as there are many companies dealing just in "Buy to let"., depleting "first time buyer" priced homes http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/buytolet/article-3352735/Britain-s-biggest-buy-let-tycoons-strike-deal-sell-900-strong-property-empire-Kent-Arab-investors-250m.html   // https://www.simplybusiness.co.uk/knowledge/articles/2022/01/huge-rise-in-buy-to-let-property-companies. If "Right to Buy" of Council AND Housing Trust properties continues, we will compound the Housing shortage yet again. These homes  were designed for those who could not afford to buy, but so they could access low rents, decent homes and have security. If they reach high salaries of £50'000 then they need to find a new security in private purchase, unless they are a key worker.A new survey indicates that first times buyer numbers have fallen from 33% to 22% and buyers of second homes has doubled. The second homes are also probably via "buy to let" Mortgages. Such a buyer only needs a salary of £25'000 and they can buy infinite homes on buy to let, though some Building Societies cap it at 5 now I think now, even that is too many and it is not a  law anyway I do not.
 

We should  consider the following and  activate  a change with immediate affect, it costs nothing in building,  but releases millions of first time buyer homes and protects them being sold to a few clever people, or overseas investors:

1) Stop "right to buy" of Council and Housing Trust properties (Michael Gove is currently now advocating "right to buy" for Housing Trust properties, compounding the housing problem yet again)
2) If a Council or Housing Trust tenant has a £30'000 or £50'000 salary they must vacate the property (unless a key worker), these homes are for those who cannot generate that sort of salary. This would release homes for the less well off. The RMT Union Deputy Leader has a salary of £78'000 but lives in a Council Home. This is not right.
3) Create a law that "buy to let"mortgages of first time buyer homes up to £500'000 are illegal.
4) Create a law that "Buy to Let" homes   must be sold singly and not en masse to 1 or 2 investors and must be sold to those with British passport, at least first time buyer range anyway (i.e up to £500'000)
5) Encourage Buy to Let owners to sell their properties by giving a tax exemption from capital gains tax for 1 or 2 years, or some other incentive to get some of these 5 million (probably more now) homes onto the property market again for couples/individuals and  not investors. This might bring the  rental and sale price of property down again due to more supply and less demand.
6) It could be considered that foreign investors are no longer allowed to buy property in the UK, so that builders build for the home market with cheaper smaller less luxurious property, rather than luxury homes that stand empty and owned by overseas investors.
7) It could be considered that those on the Council Housing list and/or on benefit can still be paid benefit even if they return to their nation of origin, or any other EU or other  nation willing to accept that situation.  Some nations have many homes but no income, it may generate work and innovation in these nations. The money for this could be taken from the Foreign Aid budget.  It has already been suggested by some that those nations not willing to take failed Asylum Seeker backs, that nation will no longer receive Foreign Aid. This also should be a new policy.


KEY POLICY 15: Transgender/Human Rights/Equality

Key Policy 16: Education on the British Empire, Slavery, Black History: The same should be done about the British Empire and slavery which I believe is now being taught in schools since the Protests of Black Lives Matter, after demands that their history is also taught. I do not not think time should be spent specifically on another nations history until  pupil subject choices come into play i.e. 16 . We have  100 plus races/cultures we have in the UK,  to teach on one  culture issue (Afro Caribbean Slavery), this is not "equality". This is a political movement and the  public should also be aware of what schools are being taught, including Transgender and left wing woke politics..  My concern also is that these  are being being taught by the black community or those with a bias against Britain and with a "revenge" and anti British slant which will create division and protests as we saw in the Pimlico School where a girl was quoted over the Media as saying that the Union Jack was racist and "nothing to do with her".  This was not balanced with the fact that as an immigrant her education was free and she was living freely in the UK by her parents choice with free NHS care and maybe welfare. That there have been maybe 1000 empires of different size and length since modern civilization began maybe 4 to 5 thousand years,  and much slavery also throughout that time. Britain happened to be one of the last Empires and the nation that brought slavery to an end  worldwide, as we were not the only nation trading in Slaves. Slavery was brought to an end  at considerable cost to the nation as the Slave Traders had to be paid off and I believe the Taxpayer  have only just finished paying this. In addition, the black nations have also dealt in slaves. Due to the bias of many and the partisan nature of those that may teach on this subject, it should perhaps be online for all too see and hear the balanced view and history in order that bias and  a new war of revenge is not sown in the black and perhaps  white  youth. The  BBC is also providing a biased view on this subject and cannot be trusted to balance the facts. The black community are also now demanding compensation. The UK and USA and many other nations pay millions in Foreign Aid to assist the African and other nations and that is the only fair way to move forward. There is a case for paying some or all of that foreign Aid directly to individuals as a type of welfare payment via their passport ID and Mobile phone, so that they can begin to develop business and employ people. Currently much of Foreign is wasted or lost to corruption in  foreign governments or leaders: Please see Key Policy 9.



Share by: